Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18r 1985. PAGE 14 <br />1899 PAUL PHILLIPS <br />2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mr. & Mrs. Paul Phillips were present. <br />APPROVAL OP MINUTES <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth questioned the applicant <br />about another division of the northern part of the <br />land located in Medina. <br />Mr. Phillips stated that they had purchased half of <br />the parcel and that division would have to be <br />resolved with the City of Medina. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that this is the <br />first time that a subdivision would be seeking a <br />minimum area credit by asking for crediting land in <br />another City. Any other subdivision had always <br />immediately satisfy the area standard within the City <br />and remainder is just additional land. She noted <br />that there should be no problem with this. The <br />assessor has confirmed that there will have to be no <br />separate PID or legal description. Majority of the <br />lands will be credited to Orono. She noted that the <br />accesses to the site were the only real problam to be <br />resolved . <br />Kelley stated that he had no problem with this <br />proposed subdivision. <br />Chairman Callahan noted that the comments made by <br />Lynn Adams to the Council at the February 25th <br />Council meeting was that there had been a motion <br />presented to the Planning Commission in relation to <br />absenteeism. He noted that absenteeism is on the <br />adgenda for the joint meeting to be held March 25, <br />1985. He also noted that to his recollection, there <br />was a question raised about absenteeism but no motion <br />was made regarding this issue and in fact it was <br />ruled that it was not the Planning Commissions busi­ <br />ness. He wishes the minutes of February 19th to <br />reflect this. <br />Chairman Callahan also noted that Council had <br />questioned the fact that only 3 members were present <br />at the February 19th Planning Commission meeting and <br />the validity of that meeting for that reason. City <br />Attorney at that time suggested that there was no <br />quorum. Callahan noted that Item 6 on the agenda for <br />the joint meeting of March 25, 1985 is in regard to <br />the quorum issue not absenteeism. <br />McDonald stated that the Planning Commission does not <br />need a quorum because they are only a recommending <br />body.