My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
11-19-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:32:19 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
jT'r'ijrr ■ <br />'■ f <br />; <br />OROtiO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEtiBER 19, 1990 <br />#1603 IRWIN JACOBS - 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:56 P.M. TO 8:05 P.M. <br />Ms. Karen Quinby. Jensen Homes, <br />representative for Mr. Jacobs. <br />was present <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mabusth provided a brief review of her November 15, 1990 <br />memo. She not«»d that if this parcel were combined with the <br />estate parcel, it would be necessary to only consider approval of <br />two Variances. <br />Kelley said, "I view this as two separate parcels. In my <br />opinion, I cannot recommend approval of this proposal." <br />Mabusth said, "Mr. Jacobs has submitted a letter indicating <br />a willingness to legally combine the parcels." <br />Kelley said, "That would shed a new light on this <br />application. I would be willing to consider the two parcels as a <br />whole, once the legal combination has been completed." <br />Cohen said, "I am not sure that legally combining the <br />parcels would change my opinion. However, I am certain that I <br />cannot approve four Variances for a 2.7 acre parcel." <br />Moos agreed that she could not approve four Variances for a <br />2.7 acre parcel. <br />Johnson concurred with Cohen. <br />Ms. Quinby asked the Planning Commission. "Are you saying <br />that you may not approve this even in the event the parcels are <br />combined?" <br />Kelley replied, "We do not know that for sure at this <br />point." <br />Ms. Qf.inby said, "You are asking that we combine the parcels <br />and then come back again." <br />Mabusth clarified, "The Planning Ccjmmission is asking you to <br />bring back a plan showing the combined parcels." <br />Bellows said, "My objections focus on the helter-skelter <br />nature of the buildings and the commercial characteristics and <br />placement of the greenhouse. I believe the structure would stand <br />more of a chance if it were more residential in appearance. I <br />also find it difficult to approve the construction of this <br />greenhouse on a 2.7 acre parcel." <br />- 9 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.