Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1990 <br />REBERS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED <br />Kelley said, "VJe are being asked to review and vote on these <br />applications. If Council agrees with an abbreviated procedure, <br />it would not be necessary for Council to reviev; each of these <br />cases. Another alteration I would like to see in this process is <br />that comparable area within the building envelope be reduced if <br />alternate back-up aprons are approved within the 50' front street <br />setback area." <br />Mabusth stated that is already being done. <br />Hanson said, "In ray opinion, the problem is an inappropriate <br />plan for the considerations." <br />Cohen said, "I agree. However, the house is constructed. <br />Our purpose this evening is to vote on the Variance and I have <br />indicated to Mr. Pilaum that I see no problem with this." <br />It v/as moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend <br />approval of the turn-around and drive%/ay configuration for 2008 <br />Sugarwood.s Drive as proposed, and that screening be provided from <br />the street. Bellows asked if the motion could be amended to <br />include language stating that this in no way sets a precedent and <br />that each property will be looked upon individually. Cohen <br />amended his motion to include Bellow's statements. Johnson, <br />seconded. Motion, Ayes-5, Kays-0. Motion carried. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to recommend <br />approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 as proposed by <br />Staff. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. <br />#1607 GARY MROZ - 65 FERNDALE GREEN <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />Gaffron displayed Mr. Mroz’s sketch plan and reviewed his <br />proposal and the related issues (see Michael Gaffron's memo dated <br />November 13, 1990). <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that access <br />for Lot One be achieved via an outlet. <br />Johnson asked whether this property currently exists as two <br />separate parcels, or as one. <br />Gaffron stated that the property currently consists of three <br />separate tax parcels which ax*e all owned by the Golf Course. <br />Johnson said, "I would not be able to support this. I think <br />the proposal is too contrived. There is no road frontage other <br />than Highway 1.2." <br />Mabusth noted that it may not be necessary to grant lot <br />- 19 - <br />M <br />i <br />IMM