My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
09-17-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:56:11 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:28:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1587-SIFORD CONTINUED <br />contractor that a five foot separation was acceptable, <br />tell the contractor to stop working on the deck." <br />He did <br />Cohen asked Mr. Siford v/hether the contractor was present <br />this evening. <br />Mr. Siford replied, "Apparently he is away working on a <br />project in Wisconsin and I can't get in touch with him." <br />Mabusth reviewed the chronology of the events involved in <br />this application (see Jeanne Mabusth's memo dated September 12, <br />1990). <br />Mr. Siford added, "Once we found out that our contractor had <br />not pulled the appropriate permits. I went to the City and made <br />sure we had the necessary permits." <br />Mrs. Siford said, "The contractor told us that we needed to <br />cut 16" off of the side of the deck facing the garage. He also <br />made an adjustment to the steps." <br />Mr. Siford added, "V/e do have the signatures from the <br />neighbors. They are happy that we are trying to improve the <br />property." <br />Bellows asked whether it would be feasible to connect the <br />garage and deck. <br />Mabusth replied, "I did talk to the Building Inspectors in <br />that regard. I went out to the site to see if that would be <br />possible. Based on the elevations of the property, it would not <br />work." <br />Bellows stated that she was also concerned about the storage <br />shed located between the garage and the house. <br />Mrs. Siford stated that the shed has been in that location <br />since 1979. <br />Bellows asked Mabusth whether the Building Inspector has <br />recommended any solution to this existing condition. <br />Mabusth replied, "Vie have only discussed what is required by <br />the Building Code if the Planning Commission recommended approval <br />of the five foot separation." <br />Johnson asked if it is not the intent of the Building Code <br />to require the ten foot separation for fire safety. <br />Mabusth replied, "That is correct." <br />- 6 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.