09-17-1990 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 ZONING FILE #1334~REBERS CONTINUED Cohen asked whether there disappearing. is a problem with trees Kelley stated that there is no such problem that he has viewed. He said, "I believe the developer is doing everything possible to enhance the development and preserve the trees." Bellows added, "There were comments made in that respect because at one point it was stated that all trees that are to be preserved are to be marked. What has proven to be more feasible is that the developer is making that assessment without marking the trees. Many mature trees have been moved into protected areas." Johnson stated that in his opinion it is not necessary for each application to be reviewed individually. He said, "We did spend a great deal of time on this. However, the Planning Commission needs to be somewhat flexible and I would prefer not to see each application come back. I think that the amendment prepared by staff should be sufficient to address the applications." Mr. Host said, "We assumed that, as with any other setback, that we could place the garage at the setback line and provide sufficient access. The protective covenants for Sugarwoods included a requirement for three-car garages. The three options provided by staff as part of the amendment would still require the property owner to meet certain standards in relation to terrain, and tree preservation, before approval is given for an approach apron to be in the front yard setback. Any configuration other than what staff has provided would need Planning Commission approval. We view the amendment as a suitable compromise." It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend that matters involving changes or variances be referred back to the Planning Commission for their review. Johnson asked whether those in favor of individual review oppose the amendment presented by staff. Kelley stated that he preferred not to impose the responsibility on staff. Cohen reiterated that he did not wish to abdicate his responsibilities. Mabusth stated that the proposal prepared by staff resulted from input received from the applicant and City staff. Kelley said, "It is important to note that the 50' setback is a different definition than that typically in our Code." Motion, Ayes-6, Johnson, Nay. Motion carried. - 2 - J