Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE I1590-MINNEGASCO, INC., CONTINUED <br />Kelley asked whether plant material could be placed outside <br />of the fence. <br />Mr. Meyer stated that may be possible. We would have to <br />request permission from VanDale (owner of the property) to screen <br />outside of that area. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that <br />screening should be provided on the north, south and west side of <br />the facility. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />approval of the C.U.P., with the condition that Minnegasco <br />provide a sketch plan showing screening for the north, west and <br />south side of the facility. Motion, Ayes-7, Nays-0, Motion <br />carried. <br />(Planning Commissioner Cohen departed at this point of the <br />meeting.) <br />#1555 LANDSTAR, INC. <br />2501 OLD BEACH ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING AND RENOTIFICATION <br />Mr. James MacKinnon, Attorney, and Mr. Dennis <br />Developer, were present. <br />Sandin, <br />Mabusth noted that Mr. MacKinnon had just left the <br />Minnetonka Beach Planning Commission Meeting. She asked him to <br />report on the action taken regarding this application. <br />Mr. MacKinnon said, "The Minnetonka Beach Planning <br />Commission gave a unanimous recommendation for approval. The <br />Planning Commission questioned whether we intended to add fill in <br />a particular location. I informed them we did not. JoEllen Hurr <br />indicated that she would recommend that the outlot be separated <br />according to the property within Minnetonka Beach and Orono so <br />each City will have its own outlot." <br />Mabusth depicted the outlot to which Mr. MacKinnon referred. <br />She said, "It is necessary for each City to have a separate <br />outlot because of the different City Ordinances each City will <br />use to govern the outlot." <br />Mr. MacKinnon continued. He said, "Ms. Hurr also indicated <br />that she may recommend to Council that they not allow any outlot <br />in that location at all, but require it to be part of Lot One and <br />Lot Two. She stated that she does not trust the University of <br />Minnesota. She is concerned that the Foundation may give the <br />outlot to the University some time in the future. The Planning <br />Commission did not include that suggestion in their motion. The <br />- 17 - <br />i