Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1589-BLUE CONTINUED <br />elevations. He stated that he intends to change tne roof <br />structure on the house in the near future. <br />There were no comments from the public pertaining to this <br />application and the Public Hearing was closed. <br />Mabusth asked Mr. Blue whether he intends <br />alterations to the deck. She informed him that <br />necessary to apply for a variance to do so. <br />to make any <br />it would be <br />Mr. Blue stated that he does not intend to do anything with <br />the deck. <br />Kelley asked Mr. Blue whether there are frost footings under <br />the deck. <br />Mr. Blue indicated that the deck has a floating slab. <br />Bellows noted that a lot coverage Variance of .046% is also <br />a consideration in this application. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />approval of the side and front street setbacks Variances and the <br />lot coverage Variance to reconstruct a garage addition. Further <br />it is recommended that approval be given for a sideyard setback <br />Variance for any possible repairs to the existing porch. Kelley <br />asked whether frost footings will be placed under the garage. <br />Mr. Blue indicated that he did not intend to have frost footings. <br />Mabusth stated that the garage will have to meet the Building <br />Code. Bellows said, "This is a much more ambitious project than <br />the drawings indicate. I am uncomfortable with the aspect of <br />approving something that has not been included in the application <br />(frost footings for porch). I also believe that the application <br />is incomplete. I do not object to the project, but I do object <br />to our voting on it without proper documentation. The <br />application makes no reference to the roof project. I think it <br />sets a bad precedent to approve this without having all the <br />information required. I do not think the elevations provided by <br />Mr. Blue are sufficient." Kelley suggested that the Planning <br />Commission and staff should review the issue of application <br />information at a later time. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0, Bellows <br />abstained. Motion carried. <br />#1590 MINNEGASCO, INC. <br />525 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:27 P.M. TO 8:40 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. Thomas Meyer and Susan Turbes, Minnegasco <br />- 14 - <br />i