My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
07-16-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 11:15:57 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:15:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 16, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1566-REGNIER CONTINUED <br />There were no comments from the public and the Public <br />Hearing was closed. <br />Rowlette reiterated her suggestion to have the one portion <br />of fencing removed and the other section filled in. She also <br />suggested that plantings be placed along the road where the <br />addition will be located to lessen the visual impact. Rowlette <br />agreed that the proposed location of the addition is the most <br />logical. <br />It was moved by Bellows* seconded by Rowlette, to recommend <br />approval of the side street setback variance to construct <br />additions to an existing residence, provided that hardcover is <br />maintained at or below 25% and that the fence along the north <br />side of the garage be removed "nd plantings be placed to screen <br />the addition from the street. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion <br />carried. <br />#1567 ROBERT a LOUANN POWELL <br />2916 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:08 P.M. TO 10:12 P.M. <br />The applicants' contractor was present on their behalf. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Gaffron summarized the information in his memo dated July <br />12, 1990 pertaining to this application. He noted that one of <br />the applicants' neighbors had contacted him and expressed concern <br />regarding the boat canopy and other issues unrelated to the deck. <br />Rowlette stated that the configuration of the deck seemed <br />odd in relation to the existing patio and tree. <br />Applicants' contractor stated that the applicants preferred <br />to have the tree located in the middle of the deck. He also said <br />that the proposed configuration will allow more light into the <br />lower level of the house. <br />There were no public comments pertaining to this application <br />and the Public Hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelle'^, seconded by Bellows, to recommend <br />that hardcover remain at 4i.8%. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion <br />carried. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend <br />approval of the average lakeshore setback variance of 13 feet. <br />Motion, Ayes-5, Nays-0. Motion carried. <br />- 19 - <br />I ’
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.