My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:13:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1532-FULLF.RTON PROPERTIES CONTINUED <br />previously expressed concern regarding the dedication of an <br />additional 7’ of right-of-way. Mabusth stated that it was first <br />thought that the right-of-way could be taken from the west side <br />of Willow at the time County Road 116 was installed. She said <br />that since that project is no longer scheduled to occ other <br />alternatives have been discussed. Mabusth stated that sue had <br />asked the City Administrator if the 7' could be dedicated from <br />the east side now, with the condition that it be vacated should <br />County Road 116 be constructed. Mabusth said that only the 7' <br />right-of-way along Lot 1, Block 1, would be retained by the City <br />due to the potential of a traffic signal being placed at the <br />intersection. <br />Mr. Cox stated that he objected to dedicating 7' of his <br />property to the City. He did not understand why the City <br />preferred to disturb the existing trees and landscaping on the <br />east side of Willow. Mr. Cox said that there is nothing on the <br />west side. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was to be continued. <br />Kelley asked Gaffron whether it may be necessary to have the <br />Planning Commission review anything further with regard to the <br />septic sites. <br />Gaffron replied that it would only be necessary if it became <br />necessary to move lot lines to accommodate septic areas. <br />Bellows believed it would be necessary to table this matter <br />due to the revision of the lot line between Lots 6 and 7 in <br />addition to the other issues yet to be resolved. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Bellows, to table this <br />application. Motion, Ayes-5, Cohen, Nay. Motion passed. <br />#1535 TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI <br />3765 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 P.M. TO 9:05 P.M. <br />Mr. Timothy Fafinski and Mr. Larry Cook, the Contract for <br />Deed owner of 3765 Watertown Road, were present. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Gaffron explained the pertinent facts involved with this <br />application to the Planning Coiwnisston. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />- 6 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.