Laserfiche WebLink
, I <br />r <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 1990 <br />#1496 ROBERT NAADE CONT. <br />Be lows said that the policy also provides for a fiifm-c. <br />rather than designing deadUnd <br />® further consideration is that should the <br />‘h^oiioh^? snowplowing the road, it is best to have straight,through roads, rather than dead-end roads. ^ <br />arwi pallahan said that with the pending McDowell <br />frano subdivisions, the City became aware of the fact that a <br />may be^°tht'‘oi?v needed for that area. He said that thismay be the only opportunity to develop a transportation plan. <br />transnlr^AV,-realtor, asked whether developing a <br />th«r Orono really wants to do? He said <br />hetluse trafficaccess the collector roads oecause traffic on those roads increases everytime the Citv <br />that" be cause‘s o\'"t ha ^uecause of that, people have a tendency to use the interior <br />roads more often and that detracts from property values. <br />#1499 PETER P, CHOW <br />2505-07 KELLY AVENUE <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW OP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Mr. Brad Johnson was present on behalf of Mr. Chow, <br />duplex.^^’"'®^*' briefly explained the applicant's proposal for a <br />with ?h/o^;;T. ^how had purchased the property <br />structure station with the intention of building a <br />structure on the property in which he could live. He said that <br />iouTd pr”e°fer^ t'^® ^®'"°del the existing structure, but <br />,.h=V 4.^4 if \ construct something that would be more <br />of thS^tJif^if neighborhood. Mr. Johnson showed a sketchor tne type of duplex proposed. <br />locat^^o" pro^r‘ty!'' objection to a duple* being <br />eye soJeT" currently exists on the property is an <br />win-i^jfasked the Planning Commission if they would be <br />willing to grant variances to the duplex section of the Code? <br />4-K general consensus of the Planning Commission that <br />they would have no objections to granting variances to the Code!