Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1486-SUSSBX SQUARE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED <br />properties and reduce the density. Brown said that he <br />prefer like the location of the tennis court and would <br />f • It located in the interior of the project which <br />would involve coining back with a revised plan. <br />further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />PJanning Commissioner Moos, to recommend denial. Motion, Aves-4 Brown, Nay. wuawn, «yes> h, <br />PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENTS <br />A. SECTION 10.52, SUBDIVISION 3 <br />B. SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14(C) <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10s30 P.M. TO 10:35 P.M. <br />duly noted^^^^^^^'^ Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />Mabusth explained the changes being proposed. <br />Kelley indicated that the inclusion of the availability of <br />municipal water service to the Ordinance for Sanitary Sewer <br />Availability in the Highway 12 Corridor area wns fine. <br />The other Planning Commissioners con*.v* red. <br />Gaffron noted the Council's request for a Planning <br />Commission recommendation regarding inclusion of all pools as lot <br />4-h® Planning CommisriOi to clarify their <br />Coverage Ordinance. ron's concerns are <br />who^-w:’? a sufficient percentage if pooJs are included and <br />whether the intent of the Ordinance was to limit visual <br />encroachment of structures that stand above ground. <br />The Planning Commission replied that was their intent. <br />Gaffron noted that there are twc different types of pools <br />should be treated differently. Gaffron <br />said that he categorizes an in-ground pool the same as a patio. <br />4-h.4. concurred with Gaffron and added, if there is a pool <br />that IS 8 above ground and has an additional deck, that is a structure. i-jiau j t, a <br />j understanding that the Planning <br />Commission would )ike the Ordinance to remain the was it was written. <br />they II:t\ndVcrit''?o^be."’‘“‘'’'’ <br />at ® required around a pool and it is <br />at least 5 high it should not be included in lot coverage?