My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
01-16-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 11:11:38 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:10:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990 <br />ZONING PILE 11483-VOGT CONTINUED <br />Kelley said thst the City has a dilema where these accessory <br />structures are concerned. He said that the property owner has <br />the right to cosmetically maintain the structure, but at the <br />point structural repair Is required the City must decide if such <br />a structure should be torn down? <br />Hanson asF , V^gt to specifically identify what he <br />replaced on the .cture? <br />Mr. Vogt said that he did the lattice work around the bottom <br />of the structure. He said that he also replaced the entire deck. <br />Hanson asked him whether he also replaced the floor joists <br />Inside the structure. <br />Mr. Vogt said that he did not replace the interior floor <br />joists. <br />Hanson noted that the floor joists are also the supports for <br />the cantilevered deck and that they look new. <br />far. <br />Mr. Vogt said that the floor joists did not go back that <br />Hanson made a comment that the floor joists must extend to a <br />certain point in order to offer proper support. <br />door. <br />Mr. Vogt said that he replaced a broken window and the rear <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Brown, seconded by Hanson, to recommend <br />approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory <br />structure, the hardship being that the building already exists. <br />Mabusth asked that the motion include a conditicn requiring the <br />applicant to apply for a bui Iding permit for the work done to the <br />deck. Kelley also suggested that a structural engineer look at <br />the boathouse and render a written opinion to the City regarding <br />its condition. Brown amended his motion to include those two <br />items, Hanson seconded. Mr. Vogt said that he would come into <br />the City offices tomorrow to obtain a permit. Mabusth suggested <br />that Mr. Vogt allow the City inspector to look at the boathouse <br />to determine what had been dene. Motion, Ayes-4, Cohen, Nay. <br />Motion passed. <br />#1484 ROXANNE STASIK <br />4470 FOREST LAKE LANDING <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:30 P.M. TO 9:37 P.M. <br />Mr. Stasik was present for this matter <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.