Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16^ 1989 <br />the™ite^“d*fVlt™^ was such that in order to <br />achieve 3 lots, the applicant should proceed with a PRD. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown concurred with Kelley. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he too agreed that a <br />PRD would be the best approach and added that it may be necessary <br />to have only a 2**lot subdivision. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson asked Gaffron to explain the <br />existing 60' road easement. <br />Gaffron explained that the easement was granted to the <br />the 5-acre calculation of acreage. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that this property <br />presented an excellent opportunity for a PRD. She said that too <br />many variances would be required in order to proceed -n any other <br />manner. Bellows indicated that she did not like the proposed <br />location for the alternate drainfield site for Lot 1. <br />if a PRD was pursued. <br />Bellows responded that she would prefer to see the alternate <br />outlets? <br />Mr. Parten questioned the size of the building envelope and <br />how the size is determined? <br />Chairman Kelley informed Mr. Parten that such a decision <br />would be his to make. <br />Mr. Parten asked for direction in this regard. <br />Gaffron indicated that he would like to see the building <br />envelope 3t 3 ininiinuin of two 3cres. <br />Johnson questioned the possibility of creating an access to <br />serve adjacent properties as well. <br />Road be used for access rather than the Luce Line. <br />Mrs. Parten asked what the requirements would be for the <br />J