Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1470 <br />November 14, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />If Planning Commission feels that these and other <br />appropriate findings provide a substantial justification to grant <br />the lot area variances requested, such that the precedent-setting <br />aspect would be minimized, then a recommendation for approval of <br />the proposed plat would be appropriate. <br />On the other hand, if Planning Commission feels that <br />granting the lot area variance here will ultimately lead to <br />pressure for lot area variances on less unique properties in the <br />5 acre zone, then the PRD concept with three distinct building <br />pads and commonly owned open space, could be considered. <br />Staff would also note that if a recommendation for approval <br />be forthcoming, the plat would be subject to the standard <br />drainage and utility easements, a drainage easement over the <br />major drainage ravine, park fees, private road easements and <br />covenants, etc. <br />, f >/. <br />/ « <br />' \r. <br />> • N <br />c' .. » •- <br />V U -O <br />-I <br />* ‘kUUA.V&MW