Laserfiche WebLink
Ipll <br />MINUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26» 1990 <br />Mr. Bichanich when the contracts will be paid in full? Mr. <br />said that issue has not been addressed. Gaffron suggested that <br />it be indicated that the lot with the principal structure would <br />be assigned a unit, the other lot would not. He said that would <br />be a tool to encourage that the lots be combined. He said, <br />however, if someone attempts to build on the other lot, they <br />should be charged for a sewer unit. CounciImeraber Nettles amended <br />his motion to address that issue in the resolution. Acting Mayor <br />Callahan seconded. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1470 DAN & ROTH PARTBN <br />4300 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Parten was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief history and <br />explanation of this apolication. Bernhardson said that h. had <br />met with Me. Pact.n today to discoss and op^^ <br />An issu. that concerns Mr. Parten is the point at whi«i tne <br />•nrivate driveway" would be upgraded with hard surface. He and <br />M^r parten discussed the long fir,, goal being ‘^e possible future <br />need for a north/south road. There could, perhaps be a <3elay of <br />upgrading the private road until such time that a third . <br />to develop or a permanent public road to the south is completed. <br />Mr. Partis his iSdicated that he would like to proceed with the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation. <br />Gaffron reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. <br />Gaffron said that the north/south driveway ^5=^5!, <br />configured as shown :ecause the Planning Commission did not want <br />Lot 2 to be a flag lot. <br />counciimember Goetten asked Gaffron where the 50' road <br />corridor referred co in his memo would be located. <br />Gaffron ? > Id that based on the discussion at the previous <br />Council meet: the City may wish to have a corridor <br />extended further north. <br />Goetten asked whether Mr. Part»n would have <br />for three 5-acre lots if the 50' corridor is included in th <br />plat? <br />raffron r^p'l-d that if both the 50* outlets along the east <br />boundary lid I iJ' outlet along the existing driveway are <br />included it wou3d have an impact r- »-he amount of ry u <br />land available.