10-15-1990 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1470 September 18r 1990 Page 4 No additional information was submitted by Parten. In Summer 1990, he sold the property to the current applicant, who has been working with ' caff to devise a PRD that addresses the issues of concern. The current applicant has acknowledged that a private road will have to be constructed in Outlet C all the way to the loop. Issues previously of concern but not addressed with the proposal include : A.Easement access for the City to Nature Conservancy parcel. B.Continuation of Outlet D for future use by Asao and Deters properties. C.Continuation of Outlet D for future access across Luce Line Trail. Regarding Item A, if the City requests an easement for access to the nature conservancy parcel, that easement would logically be through the neck area of Lot 1, Block 1. The applicant could be requested to provide such an easement, which would have no significant effect on the subdivision. The intent of that easement would be merely for City maintenance of the nature conservancy parcel should the City acquire it, and would not be intended to provide public access to that parcel. Regarding access to Asao and Deters, if an access corridor was dedicated now, such corridor likely being within open space Outlot B, the City would not have to deal with the homeowner's association in the future should such an access become necessary. Asao and Deters have stated they have no need for such an access. Regarding the access to the north, such a concept met with extreme resistance from property owners in the area, and if proposed along the east property line would have a significant effect on septic sites for Lot 1, Block 3 if such a road was ever developed. Council might consider the option of making Outlot D 50* wide, and ending it at the south end of Lot 1, Block 3, with the idea that should a future connection to the north become necessary, there is adequate acreage in Outlot B and in the Reiersgord property to accomodate that. Staff RecoHBendation Because Mr. Parten last appeared before the Council, this application for preliminary plat is brought forth again to the Council. The Planning Commission has not reviewed this specific proposal. Council's options are as follows: i i