05-21-1990 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINOTES OP APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING • * . . . . . . ZONING FILE #1516-MACMILLAN CONTINOED include only the dedication of the cul-de-sac at this time.' Gaffron's interpretation is that the cul-de-sac be constructed at this-time. Gaffron stated that clarification will be necessary. Larry Hanson said, "I have a strong suspicion that no matter where the cul-de-sac is located, once future development occurs, it will be in the wrong place." Kelley stated that it would not make sense to move the cul- de-sac down toward to Fox Street. Bellcv’^ stated that perhaps the cul-de-sac does not make sense. Gaffron stated that from a safety aspect and the requirer.-.ent3 of the Building Code, a cul-de-sac should be included. Gaffron asked Larry Hanson how wide the gravel portion of the road is. Larry Hanson replied that the gravel portion is 16' wide. Kelley quickly reviewed the issues involved with this application. The Planning Commission agreed t'nat the grade is too steep to realign the Outlot as proposed by the City Engineer. Kelley observed that the existing 16' paved portion of the driveway will serve more houses than the gravel portion of the road. The City is asking that the gravel portion be constructed to meet City standards which require a 24' or 26' paved v»idth. In regard to the tennis court, Kelley stated that it should be removed. Moos, Cohen, Kelley, Bellows and Johnson agreed that the cul- de-sac is not necessary. Kelley stated that Outlot C should be aligned along the existing driveway. As far as the upgrading of Outlot C, Kelley stated that the portion to be upgraded is beyond the driveway entrance of the new lot. Johnson suggested that Outlot C not be upgraded until Outlot B is developed. Bellows, Kelley, Hanson, and Moos agreed with Johnson. Cohen favored upgrading Outlot C to a 24 foot width. Johnson stated that Lot 1, Block 1, still presented a problem because of the fact that it is a buildable lot. - 4 - ... t .