Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1533 <br />page 2 <br />‘SirsSu?/ # <br />. T <-htt citv Engineer is now3. Per Exhibit I, the d <br />recommending that Chr ^ ^nd Ducharme <br />?rpfa looppakve PV OacHa..e <br />aSnarlclund for this to work. <br />4. Does the Planning “™^fi°si,on'^withLt an access <br />to approve the plining Commission have any <br />outlot? Further, %uch a Subdivision <br />i"s5i1n":t ‘in," a\° a’lle%°:%o\“/idor to the east via an <br />outlot? . <br />5. in staffs °Pf"j;®J^ e\tSeSSly^lim^ted°Ss to° house <br />proposed lot line ® _f suitable slopes for the <br />locations, since °i\|SSate site leaves very <br />probable mound sy®^^®® ®"ongtruct a house. My sense is <br />little area be in the area of 6-7% <br />that the pf ^There also may be some concernslopes (See Exhibit F). Tner property <br />about a drainage '^.^y Finally» an alternate ®^^® <br />affecting ®®P'^i^®f®b‘ut s?opes averaging 18% south of <br />Lot 1 must be do'^bt® as to whether this is <br />the house raise some <br />possible. <br />or flag lot? <br />Skere"?"°Doe^th:^oad'hav^ <br />3. substandard area of Lot 1 based on Enginee <br />proposal? Tot 1? Viable <br />4. Alternate drainfield site for Lot <br />building site for Lot 2? <br />Ple.se .1.0 review she coe.ents of h- Ciry Engineer, <br />Exhibit !•