Laserfiche WebLink
«( <br />Tot Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Prom: <br />Datez <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />April 19, 1990 <br />Sobjecbt Lot 2, Block 2, Sugar Woods - Request for Loop Driveway <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit P - <br />Exhibit G - <br />Exhibit H - <br />Exhibit I - <br />Pflaum's Letter <br />Site Plan - Loop Drive <br />Site Plan - Turnaround <br />Site Plan - Backout Apron + Interior Turnaround <br />Cul-de-sac <br />Site Plan Approved by Staff with Issuance of <br />Building Permit <br />Affidavit - Steiner & Koppelman Inc. <br />Hardcover Fact Sheet <br />Area Calculations for Sugar Woods Lots <br />Staff Sketches <br />The developer of Sugar Woods has asked for clarification <br />concerning Condition 1-F of Resolution #2652 (resolution <br />approving conditional use permit for PUD), written as follows: <br />F. The applicant has created a no-grading zone/woodlands <br />protection area within the private open space outlets <br />(namely Outlets A and B), and the setback areas defined <br />within each building lot. Within those areas no future <br />owner will be allowed to remove trees in excess of 2" in <br />diameter at 4' above grade. No grading is a1lowed within <br />the protected area, however, each resHential lot may <br />include one driv eway up to 20' wide leading to the loop <br />road. This driveway may be graded and trees of any size may <br />Be removed to build it. The subdivider's agreement should <br />also define the protected areas such as the setback area of <br />each lot and the private open space outlets. <br />Staff has not researched the minutes nor the staff memos <br />that would confirm the City's Intent regarding this specific <br />directive of that condition. It is the City's position that a <br />single access/curb cut/driveway with a maximum width of 20' was <br />to be installed to serve each residential pad. Such a driveway <br />would cross the 50' wide front street protected area. The single <br />underlying theme of this PUD has been to protect the unique trees <br />within the subdivision. This condition was an attempt by the <br />City to lessen the impact on the tree growth by limiting access <br />drives to one at a maximum width of 20'. It would be the City's <br />position that a loop driveway would be two driveways. It is the <br />developer's position that a looped driveway is one driveway and <br />not prohibited by resolution 12652. Please review Exhibit A, Mr. <br />Pflaum's letter reflects his clients position. <br />: