My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
06-18-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:48:28 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:41:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1465 <br />October 10/ 1989 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Regarding the fence height variance request/ please review <br />the proposed site plan for pillar locations and the fence detail. <br />The fence would appear to be relatively open in character. In <br />this location/ since West Ferndale Road is not considered a major <br />thoroughfare nor is it a MSA funded road/ maximum allowable fence <br />height without a variance would be 3.5'. <br />Staff Reco—endation - <br />Given the history of hardcover increases on this property, <br />the current request would seem to be a significant increase with <br />little in the way of hardship offered by the applicant in support <br />of the request. Also, given the history of revisions just during <br />the current remodeling over the last two years, a lack of good <br />initial site planning seems apparent. <br />Planning Commission should address the following specific <br />issues in any recommendation for approval or denial of the <br />variances requested: <br />1. Should the circular deck be allowed to be reconstructed, <br />leaving a total of 2.9% hardcover in the 0-75* zone? <br />2. Should a fence height variance be granted to allow the « <br />fence as proposed? <br />3. What degree of hardcover variance is appropriate for the <br />driveway area? Should the circular driveway be allowed? If <br />not/ would Planning Commission prefer the driveway layout as <br />previously existed to be retained, including the back-up <br />apron? <br />4. If the pre-existing driveway layout is retained, <br />hardcover percentage will increase above the 36.8% approved <br />in 1988. Per Exhibit H-e, hardcover excluding sidewalks <br />could be as follows: <br />House, deck (items A thru M) <br />Less portion in 0-75' zone <br />Pre-existing driveway (per Exh. H-b) <br />75-250' Net <br />5/461 s.f. <br />407 s.f. <br />1/004 s.f. <br />5/978 s.f. - 37.7% <br />5. How much additional hardcover would be allowed for <br />sidewalks (410 s.f. or 2.6% is shown on Exhibit H-c}?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.