Laserfiche WebLink
....A rLv.M.vr. carassiw »5nrri.'.-c iirin .vo\i?ajER is, 1976 - page 4 <br />^ic!r yard setback of 6*. She wanted setback to be <br />the required 10*. Ron Crurdeen, neighbor to the north, was <br />not concerned about the side yard setback. Hwever, he did <br />c'^iect to the proposed location which woulu extend 15-20' <br />closer to the lake than his hone. After their cwments were <br />hcr.rJ, Qniivorvir Ikinlap stated that this natter would be <br />continued later in the neeting and that Mr. Ortenblad <br />tojuld he infomed of these concerns. <br />N'om Kuclin, son of the applicant, was present. Tlie Zoning <br />/‘J.ninistrator stated that the applicant is requesting <br />approval to add a garage to the existing non-conforming lot <br />Tlie cars, etc. that he is currently storing outdoors would <br />new be enclosed. Per n>’ suggestion, he has agreed to <br />rjiinta*n an 84' side yard setback, a 10* setback from his <br />house and a 22' setback from his property line along Olive <br />Avenue. Proposed parage would be 22* x 22*. F** proposed <br />location would be ch.inpcd to meet side yam setback, the <br />re.ar entrance to house would be obstructed. <br />ii^oolley rovctl, Guthrie seconded, to appro\*e aeiri.ances so <br />as not to obstruct the house entry and no other land is <br />aiTilable. Motion - Ayes (5), .'lays (0). <br />Mr. Jensen was present. He Is requesting approval for an <br />.*kiJition to their non-conforming structure which docs not <br />rret the front and side yard setback requirement. Tlie <br />prrnoscd addition would haw no affect on Uie front yard <br />srcli.ic.k; however, the sane 2.8* side yard setback vr*'' be <br />luintnincd. Hank liihich stated that the unimproir* i^'ti-u <br />alley hetween subject property and neighbor to tlit ..arth <br />i*ruld tend to provide the ncccrsary dist.nnce between <br />strictures. The addition wcxild be an improvement to the <br />property. No otlier land i.s nvaihihic for exp.mslan. TWo <br />lots arc combined. <br />.. •.i r;"'dr-rc!'~n.ild secomletl, to ajqirove liL*crj3c of the <br />n-ture of the lot. no other lanti is awilable, platted <br />alley provides necessary distance between structures, no <br />additional cncnvidinent .is proposed addition wr- Id only be <br />a conrinu.ition of existing house lines. 'bti« - Ayes (5). <br />Nays lO). <br />Tlie Planning Cormission took .action on the following Work <br />.Session items. <br />Hie *.cninp Administrator stated tlwt the •fandalc*s are <br />requesting .ippro\*al to add a 24* x 30* attached garage to <br />tiicir e::isting duel ling. Tlie present tuck-iaider garage <br />*«xxj Ii1 he used as a rccre.ition room. There vtjuld be no <br />e*'r''*e in access. All seth.ick rewiiregents vtxild be met. <br />•r-re is no way to expand lot. <br />fsithric moved, ll.'mnah seconded, to recerrmd aporoval as <br />m» other land Is available and all setback requirtnents <br />•.ill be met. 'totion - Aves (5), Nays (0). <br />WARREN 0RTEN*DLAD <br />(Continued) <br />•19S) <br />EDIYIN KUGLIN <br />2314 aiADYHOOO RttAD <br />VARIANCE - ADO GARAGE <br />TO NON-OONPOfWI.NG LOT <br />AND SIDE YARD G STREET <br />SETBACK <br />(•196) <br />CURT JENSON <br />2700 ETHEL AVEJUE <br />VARIANCE • LOT AREA 6 <br />SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR <br />ADDITION TO NCN-CafPOWL'C <br />LOT <br />(•197)