Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br />• « • * <br />I <br />Notwithstandin, the u7e pS^when <br />pr/A^wa^r «aoSd3 <br />^r\,irVhl%rore»/A'A ^Ptaneed a <br />based, in part, because the sai^ ^ forming than a <br />retail operation (marina) was property h- w been used as a <br />transmission repair business. un. jr Section 10.03, <br />marina in Conditional Use Permit has lapsed, <br />subd. 5E of property should be for a permitted use in <br />'Si rR-lA%“str?A unless^ variance can legally be granted to <br />Section 10.3, subd. 5E. <br />The City Council appears to have three alternatives with <br />regard to the pending application. <br />rniinciT May Deny the APPlicatiPJl» <br />The Council may deny the j^^rina^^withTn the last <br />that the property has not been conditional Use Permit has <br />twelve months, ^'c _A a-he 1.987 Conditional Use Permit has <br />i^^r"'in elsfnce^^ ablndone^ thfn any future use of the property <br />must'be consistent with the zoning ordinance. <br />The Council may deny the^l987 O^nditional Use <br />applicant failed to meet the ^ -permit"" prior to June 8, <br />Permit based relating to what type of permit the <br />^^prUcanT:rs%f sfc:re^"this is the'most difficult argument to <br />make. <br />flay ADorove the Condit^idnal <br />permit. <br />2. <br />Since the existing va"e <br />City may grant a Section 10.03^ subd. 5E; however, <br />first applied for and such a variance can even be <br />if the Council to complete our legal research of <br />granted, then we should other jurisdictions to see how <br />”is;trhtve"" -t^S'the^q" stion of whether or not a variance can <br />be granted to non-conforming use provisions. <br />Deniea-3. <br />As part of any ° t he ”^^itl^'^shou Id ^ determine <br />rh^f^t1irp^oplrty^Vi"n^^ <br />nSt granted for this or other commercial use. <br />-5-