Laserfiche WebLink
Watertown Pd - Septic System Testing Review #1506 carol Senn, 3220 Watertown <br />March 1, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />5. Because runoff from the ®"a'’iu«n«e‘'“sUes''on <br />flows generally a swale would need to be <br />Lot 2 towards -[tes to keep them fromprovided between those two si s better solution would be <br />affected by spring carlson subdivision to theto direct all tun-off from the ca^r^i^^ subdivision, <br />ditch along Watertown Road, poad westward to the <br />continue that ‘^ttch al 9 these drainfield <br />creek. This would ° ^tia 1 for saturation due to <br />with a greatly transient surface water flows. <br />^Uar*ana*“ori/iSo\*'he"sxprct^/to%Tf«t^S^ <br />the creek. <br />7. Bavin, walked f“;irtTat'ydufona7'd%afnfiM^ <br />|ftU“citl"be'locatld t"o support a third lot within this <br />propertypropet'-Jf _ .. <br />8. Within Lot 1, the ^appeared to <br />proposed house contains tree in the middle of that low <br />be a fairly large be significant as a wetland, <br />spot. This did not on ^our designated wetlands <br />and does not show be any compelling reason to <br />?f,SireT^d%ra^4 efseS^ov^^r this^low area. <br />------------------- <br />affected by the creek.arrectcu wj <br />in summary, I would <br />^J?m^a\7 a‘^“‘al\“e\'’na\VUwa\"a%\rm*ent moLd drainfiald systems. <br />ry anu ------------------ - ^ H to <br />Ke,ardln, the P'°P°=®/J’Jjt'rprivaK^drVvCTaV""^^^^^ <br />H'the ”ryul"red’';r!nc?pai structure setb,^ Ve°,’’u^:drt“aJ"i,ht <br />Sa?ro"w'“house”’dlpic\ed on the survey.) <br />D <br />i <br />■i