Laserfiche WebLink
-•‘A <br />h <br />Zoning File #1507 <br />March 15, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />List Of Exhibits - <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit P <br />Exhibit G- <br />Exhibit G- <br />Exhibit H- <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />- Application <br />- Property Owners List <br />- Plat Map <br />- Site Plan <br />- Building Permit #002402 <br />- Amended Floor Plan - 3rd <br />•1 - North Elevation Approved at Time of Builcing <br />Permit <br />2 - Amended North Elevation <br />1 - south Elevation Approved at Time of Building <br />Permit <br />-2 - Amended South Elevation ^ <br />-1 - West Elevation Approved at Time of Building <br />Permit <br />2 - Amended West ElevationExhibit I- <br />Review of Application - <br />During a routine building inspection, the <br />the addition of windows at the upper third level <br />was advised to submit amended plans for third fl®jr <br />structural changes within roof area. ^hej!°ning staf^ was <br />advised and with the addition the third floor, it was <br />necessary to recalculate the height of the structure. Tne <br />Building Wartment had other concerns t®^«ted to required access <br />from floor area in excess of 500 s.f. Review the floor plan for <br />the third floor (Exhibit F), the Building Department s comments <br />are noted on that plan. <br />The architect for the applicant had worked ”^th an adjacent <br />neighboring property's residence a few years hack, the Wil1 Jam <br />Ulrich home, noting that that structure had <br />window and the height was not determined from the ceiling jo <br />of that third story but rather from the ‘^^®-^®"5viUd”tha^ <br />second floor to the point of the gable roof. J_-tation <br />there has been a change in the review as far as Ration <br />and determination of height based.overn height allowances. The architect claimed that he naa no <br />knowledge that there was any change in <br />from his original dealings with the City with the Olrich <br />residence. Staff advised that there indeed <br />ment, but a change in the Interpretation in the 2 1/2 <br />story height and the impact of high gable structures with a thi <br />story. <br />Li