My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
02-20-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:32:59 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:28:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br />LAW OFFICES <br />DAVID B. MORSE <br />A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION <br />7607 CREEKRIOGE CIRCLE <br />P O. BOX 330 <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55440 <br />(612) 944-5722 <br />TELECOPIER (612) 629-2317 <br />January 18, 1990 <br />f1 <br />City of Orono <br />Attention: Jean Mabiist <br />Planning and Zoning Department <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />RE: Lot 1, Block I, North Arm Estate Second Addition <br />Dear Jean: <br />T represent Katherine P. Axel, the owner of the above described real estate. <br />This item was on the Planning Commission agenda on Tuesday, January 16, <br />1990 as item #13 for a "sketch - plan review" and was presented by Mr. Don <br />Peterson of K-P Properties, Inc. I was in attendance and heard the <br />discussion. <br />I thought it important for your background information to correspond with <br />you and give you some additional information with respect to the City's <br />request for an additional 17 foot of roadway and the corresponding hardship <br />that this will create with respect to the property as well as Mrs. Axel <br />personally, if the 17 feet is taken: <br />1. First of all, as was noted by Hon Peterson, the 33 foot strip for the <br />present roa<l did come from the North Arm Estates property. <br />2. This is a private road way and is owned by Armstrong whom I believe <br />continues to pay taxes on it although the City has apparently <br />maintained the road. <br />3. With respect to the Olson property. T think at such time as a <br />subdivision is requested, obviously as a precondition the City can get <br />the 17 feet it needs for the road from the Ol.son property as opposed <br />to the North Arm Estates property. <br />4. At such time as Armstrong property is developed, I assume as a <br />precondition, the City can extract the present 33 foot strip as a <br />dedicated road as well as its cul-de-sac, etc., that they may need <br />on the Armstrong property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.