My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:25:58 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:19:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1558 <br />August 17r 1990 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />The Planning Conunission must provide clear direction to the <br />applicant on what is realistic in light of the code and <br />previous actions by the Council. <br />3.Hardcover is excessive in the 75-250' setback area. If <br />density is reduced, this may result in a decrease in the <br />hardcover, although applicant and applicant's consultant has <br />advised that the footprint would be proposed at the same <br />size. Clearly applicant must make adjustments in the 75- <br />250' setback area. In addition, all hardcover within the 0- <br />75' setback area must be pulled behind the 75* setback line. <br />4.Riparian use. Based on the 152 lineal feet <br />the LMCD code would allow 1 boat slip per <br />footage. No matter what density is approved, <br />would be allowed 3 slips only. The Sandy <br />currently has 7 slips at a shared dock under <br />of a joint use dock license. <br />of shoreline, <br />50' of lineal <br />a shared dock <br />Beach Resort <br />the authority <br />5.Access. In a formal subdivision application, the County <br />will be asked to review the proposed location, although it <br />would appear that we have clearly a less-intense use of the <br />property. <br />Unfortunately, I do not have elevations of the multi- <br />residential unit proposed with the application. The architect <br />did discuss preliminary sketches and elevations. Mr. Zuckman may <br />be able to provide them at our meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.