My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:25:58 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:19:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To:Planning Conunission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />#// <br />PrcxB:Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:August 17, 1990 <br />Subject: #1574 James & Sue Ronald, 2565 Dunwoody Avenue - <br />Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - LR-J.C, Single family lakeshore residential, k <br />acre, sewered <br />Application - Request for hardcover and setback variances to <br />construct room addition and pool. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey v <br />Hardcover Calculations by Applicants' Surveyor <br />Staff Hardcover Review <br />Letter to Applicants' 7/6/90 <br />Construction Plans <br />Pertinent Facts - <br />1.Applicants are proposing to raise the northerly wing of the <br />house approximately 6' to match the floor level elevations <br />which currently are offset, and cantilever approximately 4' <br />closer to the north lot line than the existing wall of the <br />house. Although there will still be an 18' setback to the <br />north lot line, the addition technically is an <br />intensification of hardcover and a further encroachment into <br />the average lakeshore setback. <br />2.Applicants also propose to construct a pool to be located at <br />^rade level on the lake side of the house. While the pool <br />is not proposed for immediate construction, applicants were <br />advised by staff to include it in their current proposal. <br />Note that the pool would have to move further south and west <br />to maintain a 10' horizontial setback between the <br />overhanging decks and the pool water surface. This would <br />likely bring the edge of the pool patio to the 75' setback <br />line, resulting in an average lakeshore setback encroachment <br />of 69'.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.