Laserfiche WebLink
L l <br />Zoning File #1467 <br />January 11, 1990 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />relocated i„ the 75-250- <br />survey to determine whal: \to2s of exiatln<,'’S''®a “Pdstod <br />be reduced within the 75-^o* hardcover could <br />addition of the deck struLnrf nfv. the <br />wish to table the application if this^is"thJ^rtfollowed by the Plann^nn n. T j the direction to be <br />survey. ^ mmission and ask for the updated <br />ie%"irr„rdVti!" “Se ‘IcT- s <br />Heview of Current implication - <br />line /or a privacy\ence^ a\*ona Ih average setback <br />applicants' application property line. As <br />will help provide Dri//cv ^ni ^« privacy fence <br />property on north side. A^licant adjoining <br />tram or the deck area approved within f®v®^K^”^ either the <br />of the average lakesho/e setback linl^ lakeshore yard in front <br />this writing, staff has heard no^h^i^ clear. As of <br />but the neighbor . ay be present at^thA°"* the adjacent neighbor, <br />position. A privacy fence^ at that present his <br />impact on the view of the lakl ^ .“®^ provide a visual <br />elevations or photographs to detenilne the W^-al^lVsctt^ll'any! <br />Options of Action - <br />le Denial based on Insufficientships. insurricient hardship or unacceptable hard- <br />2. <br />^ceXabi; hardsWps".VyoSr m«tl?/® r‘f sddltlonalfor this review ^has failed r ^"^®™ation submittedhardship. failed to demonstrate sufficient <br />3. <br />"SS.“ K-5Sline. beyond the average lakeshore setback <br />structure o^'l'^t^\^*^ east "*®"'’^ets may note kennel <br />would recSmmend th“°the apl!l«n^A ““®'^ right-of-way. staff <br />combination to allow credit for “ special lotlot. credit for principal residence on homestead