My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2022 4:20:17 PM
Creation date
11/21/2022 8:25:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # LA22-000051 <br />21 Nov 2022 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Hardcover Setback Variances (Sections 78-1282 & 78-1680) <br />With few exceptions, hardcover is prohibited within the shore setback zone 75-feet from the OHWL <br />of the lake. A driveway with a maximum width of 8 feet is permitted within the 75-foot setback if <br />the property has no alternate access. Additionally, patios and other hard surface improvements are <br />not permitted within the 75-foot setback. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic <br />considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are <br />not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be <br />granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in <br />harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is <br />not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />variances for hardcover expansions within the 75-foot lake yard are not supported by <br />practical difficulties. 75-foot lake yard hardcover and construction prohibitions are <br />intended to maintain the natural lakeshore, increase infiltration opportunities, and <br />encourage development away from the lake. The requested variances to expand the <br />driveway hardcover and new patio areas within the 75-foot setback are not in harmony <br />with the Ordinance. This criterion is not met. <br /> <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance to permit additional <br />hardcover within the 75-foot setback is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The <br />applicant has not identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting <br />their requests. The increase in hardcover within the protected 75-foot setback from the <br />OHWL is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is not met. <br /> <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; Reasonable use of the Property is established <br />with the existing principal structure including the minimal width access driveway. <br />The request to permit an expansion of the driveway hardcover and to create two <br />additional hardcover patio areas within the 75-foot lake setback is not reasonable. <br />The proposal results in a 3,029 square foot increase of hardcover within the 75- <br />foot setback and is not reasonable. The variance to install new hardcover areas
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.