Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA18-000065 <br />September 17, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />The parcel has been the subject of sketch plans and preliminary plats in the past: <br />File Number Date Lots Notes <br />867 Jul-78 11 Lots range in size from 40,000 to 72,555 sf <br />2240 Jun-97 10 10 of 17 lots on subject property. Lots <br />ranged in size between 45,000 and 66,300 <br />sf. 3 conforming 1.0 acre lots, 7 non- <br />conforming lots <br />2293 Sep-97 11 11 of 14 lots on subject property. 3 <br />conforming lots, 8 non-conforming. <br />Submitted as Preliminary Plat, Comp plan <br />Amendment, Rezoning, Street Vacation <br />LA18-000018 Mar-18 11 Withdrawn by applicant. 4 conforming lots, <br />7 non-conforming lots <br /> <br />These previous proposals included a desire to be served by the Municipal sanitary sewer service, <br />requiring comprehensive plan amendments at that time. <br /> <br />Proposal <br />The applicants plan is attached as Exhibit B. The development proposes to extend Wildhurst <br />Trail to the north boundary of the parcel, to terminate in a cul de sac. Wildhurst Trail is a public <br />road. On the east side of the extended Wildhurst, 4 lots are proposed (numbered as lots 5-8). <br />These lots are in the Metropolitan Urban Services area (MUSA) and would be served by <br />municipal sanitary sewer services. Each lot is greater than the 1.0 acre required. Lots 5, 6, and 7 <br />appear to include a 929.4 elevation, which would mean that these lots would be lake lots, and <br />subject to the lot width measurement at the lake, and at 75 feet landward of the lake. If Lake <br />lots, it does not appear that the lot width requirement (100 feet) can be met. The Commission <br />should comment on their appetite for flexibility on the lot width issue here. Lot 8 appears to be <br />encumbered by a wetland, a delineation will clarify the encroachment. <br /> <br />West of the extended road, 4 lots are proposed (numbered 1-4). These lots exceed the 2 acre <br />lot acre minimum gross lot size, but some of these lots have slopes greater than 18%, these <br />areas cannot be included in the lot area calculation. Lots 1-4 are 157.42 to 156.75 feet wide, <br />measured at the street, the width requirement is 200 feet. <br /> <br />These lots are not located within the MUSA and would be served by on-site septic systems. The <br />slopes on proposed lots 3 and 4 may limit options for locations. The 4 lots should be considered <br />conceptual, of importance in developing the final plan is the analysis of the parcels to confirm <br />that each lot can support two septic sites for 5 bedroom homes. The Commission should also <br />comment on their appetite for flexibility from the lot width requirement for these lots. <br /> <br />The proposal does not suggest the need for a comprehensive plan amendment, or a rezoning. <br />No house plans, or sale price of the lots, has been indicated. <br /> <br />Environmental Impact <br />The developer is advised that this subdivision is subject to the City’s Conservation Design <br />Ordinance. The project will be reviewed in terms of the Rural Oasis goals and policies which