My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Insulation
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
180 Big Island - PID: 23-117-23-23-0036
>
Land Use
>
Insulation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:12:57 PM
Creation date
9/18/2015 3:12:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
180
Street Name
Big Island
Address
180 Big Island
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2311723230036
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 13, 2003 <br /> Lyle Oman <br /> Building Official <br /> City of Orono <br /> Orono, MN <br /> Dear Sir: <br /> Please consider this letter my official request to adjourn a board of appeal as per section <br /> 105 of the 1977 Uniform Building Code. This request is made in response to your <br /> refusal to consider utilization of Structural Insulated Panels (SIPS) designed for below- <br /> grade construction in my project at 180 Big Island. <br /> Recapping my situation, I provided the city with my initial set of drawings in January <br /> 2003. These drawings detailed the materials and construction of the specified panels. <br /> During your initial review, you indicated that I had not provided ample information for you <br /> to approve the below-grade panels. At that time, you requested information on NER <br /> and/or ICBO testing for these panels. <br /> I contacted Extreme Panels Insulspan, the manufacturer of the proposed panels, and <br /> determined that the below-grade panels do not have an NER or ICBO number. The <br /> manufacturer did, at that time, provide a new set of plans with a structural engineering <br /> stamp. The manufacturer also agreed to provide additional information on the <br /> engineering of these panels including: <br /> 1) Engineering data (from the approving engineer) addressing any specific <br /> concerns you might have. <br /> 2) Reassurance from the foam manufacturer including testing for below-grade use <br /> of their product. <br /> 3) Reassurance from the board manufacturer including testing for below-grade use <br /> of their product. <br /> 4) Test results from the University of Minnesota regarding the structural integrity of <br /> the proposed panels. <br /> IYs my understanding that an NER and/or ICBO certification is not a requirement for <br /> building material. IYs also my understanding that you have the authority to review other <br /> testing data and engineering during the approval process. It's my opinion, however, that <br /> your statements to me and to Duane DeLonais, a representative of the Minnesota <br /> Building Codes and Standards Division, did not demonstrate a good faith effort to review <br /> these materials. Your comment to me that you would not consider"anything" other than <br /> an NER or ICBO approval is inconsistent with the National and State guidelines for <br /> alternate building materials. Section 104.2.8 in the UBC states that alternate materials, <br /> alternate designs, and method of construction can be reviewed for approval. Extreme <br /> Panels Insulspan is using this method in several surrounding communities after being <br /> approved by the local officials— some with an engineer's stamp and some without. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.