Laserfiche WebLink
February 13, 2003 <br /> Lyle Oman <br /> Building Official <br /> City of Orono <br /> Orono, MN <br /> Dear Sir: <br /> Please consider this letter my official request to adjourn a board of appeal as per section <br /> 105 of the 1977 Uniform Building Code. This request is made in response to your <br /> refusal to consider utilization of Structural Insulated Panels (SIPS) designed for below- <br /> grade construction in my project at 180 Big Island. <br /> Recapping my situation, I provided the city with my initial set of drawings in January <br /> 2003. These drawings detailed the materials and construction of the specified panels. <br /> During your initial review, you indicated that I had not provided ample information for you <br /> to approve the below-grade panels. At that time, you requested information on NER <br /> and/or ICBO testing for these panels. <br /> I contacted Extreme Panels Insulspan, the manufacturer of the proposed panels, and <br /> determined that the below-grade panels do not have an NER or ICBO number. The <br /> manufacturer did, at that time, provide a new set of plans with a structural engineering <br /> stamp. The manufacturer also agreed to provide additional information on the <br /> engineering of these panels including: <br /> 1) Engineering data (from the approving engineer) addressing any specific <br /> concerns you might have. <br /> 2) Reassurance from the foam manufacturer including testing for below-grade use <br /> of their product. <br /> 3) Reassurance from the board manufacturer including testing for below-grade use <br /> of their product. <br /> 4) Test results from the University of Minnesota regarding the structural integrity of <br /> the proposed panels. <br /> IYs my understanding that an NER and/or ICBO certification is not a requirement for <br /> building material. IYs also my understanding that you have the authority to review other <br /> testing data and engineering during the approval process. It's my opinion, however, that <br /> your statements to me and to Duane DeLonais, a representative of the Minnesota <br /> Building Codes and Standards Division, did not demonstrate a good faith effort to review <br /> these materials. Your comment to me that you would not consider"anything" other than <br /> an NER or ICBO approval is inconsistent with the National and State guidelines for <br /> alternate building materials. Section 104.2.8 in the UBC states that alternate materials, <br /> alternate designs, and method of construction can be reviewed for approval. Extreme <br /> Panels Insulspan is using this method in several surrounding communities after being <br /> approved by the local officials— some with an engineer's stamp and some without. <br />