Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1010 <br />March 11, 1986 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />in area nor less than 120 feet in width at the building line. <br />(exhi.b= t 1). The house on the subject property was built in <br />1955. It was between the mid and late 50's that the City <br />developed review policies to control densities. Finally, in <br />1959, '.'--he City adopted a minimum lot size ordinance requiring <br />approval by the City before a building permit. could be issued for <br />any lot less than 1 acre in area and 140 at the building line, <br />The Pattern of Development is as follows: <br />a) lot widths <br />50'-59' 60'-79' <br />5orl6% 16or50$ <br />80'-99' <br />lor3% <br />100'-150' <br />10or3l% <br />10 of the 32 units sati s t y current lot width <br />of the 32 units would satisfy the 80% standard. <br />units ranked at the 10 0' -15 0' widths are legally <br />the same as the subject property. <br />b) lot area <br />7, 000-10, 0 0 0 s f <br />8 or 25% <br />18, 000-22, ►00sf <br />4 or 12% <br />10, 000-18, 000sf <br />14 or 44% <br />22, 001-40, 000sf <br />6 or 19% <br />standards. 11 <br />9 of the 10 <br />combined lots <br />31% or 10 units satisfy the 80% area standards a 1 1 six of <br />the units that rank at the 22-40,000sf contain 34,000sf to <br />40, 000sf in area and are a 1 1 legally combined as is the subject <br />property. <br />The two immediate neighbor, to the south of the subject <br />property have submitted letters in opposition to the proposal <br />(exhibits E & F). The Gustaf sons own one of the six units that <br />contain over 35,000sf in area with a total of 150 feet of lot <br />width. ( lots 29 & 30) Staff has recieved no written comments in <br />support of the Hall application. <br />An inspection of the property reveals a low area within lot <br />28 that may be a drainageway or collection area for a small <br />watershed. The area is not designated on the of f ica 1 maps as a <br />wetland. Elevations may be required. <br />Planning Commission members should <br />support material submitted by staff <br />additional information is necessary to <br />please prior to meeting. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />review the findings and <br />and advise staff if <br />assist in this review - <br />1 - will <br />the applicant be <br />deprived of a "resonable <br />use" of <br />his property <br />if <br />denied the additional <br />residental unit? <br />Can you <br />