01-21-1986 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: From: Date: Planning Commission Members Jeanne A. Mabusth, January 14, 1986 Zoning Administrator Subject: #1003 Hans G. Weiler, 1135 North Arm Drive - Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District - LR-1B Total Area = 61,491 s.f. (excluding area of Lot 6) Lot 6 = 11,200 s.f. approximately 7 2, 6 91 s.f. Total Area Areas of Residential Units After Subdivision Weiler Parcels B & C = 35,226 s.f. Kempf Parcel A = 26,265 s.f. Application - Subdivision lot line rearrangement of platted properties. Applicant Weiler was granted subdivision approval on July 10, 1972 for the same lot line rearrangement a n order to build new house at 1125 North Arm Drive - See Exhibit E & G. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/5/72 Exhibit E - Council Minutes of 7/10/72 Exhibit F - Buildi:g Permit For Garage - 1135 North Arm Drive Exhibit G - Building Permit For New Residence - 1125 North Arm Drive Exhibit H - Plat Map Designating Ownership Exhibit I - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement Weiler owned Lots 6, 20-23 & 30-33 of the Skarp & Lindquist's Fernhi l l plat. In 1972 he applied for a lot line rearrangement in order to build a new residence on Lots 22 & 23. The survey for that subdivision revealed that Weiler's residence encroached into Lot 22 and a lot line rearrangement was also required. Note that a si. bdi vi sion review was required in that day because the lots did not satisfy lot area and width standards (43,560 s.f. in area and 140 feet of lot width. The house on Lots 22 & 23 and Lots In the process of filing deeds etc. it (Weiler's homestead) encroached Lot Weiler. The subdivision, as approved filed. A house was built on Lot 22 and F) based on a subdivision approval that 30 & 31 has been sold to Don Kempf. was noted that the house on Lot 21 22 creating finance problems for by Council in 1972, had never been a now garage on Loot 2 ( see Exhibit created the new dividing line. Staff sees no problem with granting subdivision approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to appropriate combination of remaining parcels as final approved building Cites (per Council recommendation of 1972).