My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
01-21-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:33:35 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 12:37:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES Cr' THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 <br />Page 5 <br />Jabbour <br />asked <br />that <br />the City <br />attorney advise the City of the REED <br />Supreme <br />Courts <br />ruling <br />that he <br />is referring to. <br />Mabusth noted that what was different in this application <br />from the Bredeson application in which the City approved <br />the creation of a new non -conforming structure. <br />Rovegno moved to approve the hardcover and lakeshore setback <br />variance application for Lachlan Reed rased on the hardships <br />of the house location on the pennisula and the interior design <br />of the house only allowing additions to be placed on the west <br />side of house. Such approval is subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />1 - Additional hardcover be offset by removing an equivalent <br />amount of hardcover to supplement for additional <br />hardcover. <br />2 - All drainage from new addtion be directed away from <br />lakeshore side - City Engineer to review drainage culvert. <br />Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayes ( 5) , Nays (1) . <br />Minority Opinion - Jabbour - He stated that he could not <br />approve of such an application that approved expansion of <br />a non conforming structure based on the recent State Supreitle <br />Court ruling. <br />(FONT. ) <br />Gerard Blohorn and Dick Hassel applicant's attorney, were �ERARD BLOHORN <br />PP Y <br />present. Mr. Hassel noted that this was not an expansion 1595 Bohns Poin <br />on the existing pool house but merely interior design changes Conditional Use <br />within the structure. Permit <br /># 6 5 2 <br />Mabusth advised the Planning Commission that the building <br />permit forbids the installation of kitchen facilities and <br />not until the Conditional Use Permit was issued,could the <br />kitchen facilities be installed. <br />Rovegno asked if it was within -the code to build bathroom <br />facilities without a Conditional Use Permit? Mabusth <br />noted that the existing pool house already had a bathroom <br />and that it was just a matter of relocating it. <br />Goetten moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for <br />Gerard Blohorn for t;ie guest house located at 1595 Bohns <br />Point Road finding that there is adequate area and width <br />to support a second residential unit and subject to the <br />condition, as required by code, that this unit may never <br />by rented. <br />Jabbour seconded. Vote: Ayes (6) , Nays (0) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.