My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1986 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
10-02-1986 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 12:21:37 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 12:19:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 14EET I NG HELD OCTOBER 2 0 , 1986 <br />11080 MCDOWELL CONTINUED <br />114r. Burger previous iy stated h(-)w t his rezoning would <br />solve his pioblem noting that he moved to this area for <br />the same reasons as the others, however he had a <br />philosophy of life being that this country was not made <br />for only him and that others deserved the right to enjoy <br />and live in this area. <br />'-1r. Burger noted that the proposed lots actually will be <br />close to five acres including wetlands. He also noted <br />the issie of the impending sewer line in the Stubbs Bay <br />area. <br />Attorney Tom Humphrey stateu that the proposed rezoning <br />was consistent with the existing sui rounding areas <br />n.:?ting that there is a natural barrier that would serve <br />as a dividing line between the proposer rezoning area <br />and the more rural. area to the, west. <br />Goetten asked Zoning Administrator rlabusth the reason <br />that area was originally zoned 5 a�:re. Additionai ly, <br />she stated that she would like staff to compile a lot <br />sire c,.)mparison, a,i:_i would like a t4-1pography map t:-) <br />refer to. <br />Zoning Administrator Maijusth state) that the 1974 <br />Comprehensive Plan diet not clairfy the reasons for the � <br />acre Lode , <br />"4cDona ld <br />stated <br />that <br />the reason for the 5 a, -re <br />zoning is <br />because Stubbs Say <br />is <br />a critical area in which <br />the soils <br />are sees i <br />t i ve <br />aril <br />5 acres are needed to <br />support a <br />septic system. <br />She <br />had concerns regarding <br />where the <br />rezoning <br />would <br />stop. <br />She is totally opposed to this <br />request. <br />i3e 1 lows stated that she felt there were more issues to <br />be considered, but felt the developers aLe not proposing <br />1/2 acre lots nor are they developing the area without <br />first substantiating it with tests and facts. <br />Zoniiiy .Ndininistrator <br />Mak;usth <br />noted <br />that there is a <br />potential sewer project <br />planner <br />in <br />Stubbs Bay. <br />Cha i i-maii <br />Kelley stated that <br />ht felt <br />mere facts should be <br />submitted <br />for review before <br />making <br />a recommendation. <br />Present representing the Department of Natural Aesources <br />was Land Specialist Jim B loomendah 1. He note.: that the <br />in this instance, the DNi2 does rift rt -yu late this <br />particular wetland' area. He additionally requester some <br />facts ru9aru inn this atjp 1 i�:at ion. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.