My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1986 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
09-15-1986 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 12:18:11 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 12:14:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF SSE PLANNING COMMISSION 14ENTING HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 <br />#1074 GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH CONTINUED <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Taylor, to recommend approval of staf f's <br />recommendation to approve the smaller "Standard" sign. <br />Motion not seconded, motion dies. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Taylor, to recommend <br />approval of the variance to allow the "Supra" sign as <br />proposed. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 4. Bellows, Kelley, <br />Goetten, and McDonald voted nay. Motion denied. <br />Planning Commission recc mmended to applicant to check <br />into larger/lower reader board signs. <br />It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to table <br />this application for alternative sign plans. Motion, <br />Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#1075 JOSEPH DURDA <br />3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIA�ICB <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:54-10:08 <br />The Affidavit <br />was noted. <br />of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />two -fold variance request within the 75' lakeshore <br />setback area 1) to construct a patio and extend the <br />existing 3' wide catwalk between the porch and bedroom <br />to allow for a second exit from the existing walk -out <br />doors off the bedroom. 2) allow the existing 144 s.f. <br />wood deck which was constructed in the Spring 1986 by <br />applicant without a permit replacing the 72 s.f. <br />concrete patio. <br />Delores Durda was present for this matter along with <br />their attorney Ray Piirainen, <br />Mrs. Durda stated that when she had the wood deck <br />constructed her husband was out of the country and the <br />contractor told her a permit was not required. <br />Mr. Piirainen explained the reason for the enlarged <br />decking area which allowed one to exit in both <br />directions whereas the other deck did not provide that. <br />Chairman <br />Kelley <br />stated <br />that it <br />was his <br />opinion that the <br />deck <br />should <br />be cut back <br />to the <br />original <br />72 s.f. <br />Goetten stated that she agreed with Chairman Kelley <br />noting hardcover concern with protecting the lake. <br />1.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.