Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 16, 1986 <br />#1040 WILLIAM ULRICH CONT. <br />McDonald stated <br />merely moves the <br />that a sea wall <br />lakeshore. <br />that by installing the sea wall it <br />muskrats down the shoreline and noted <br />wou' d never be approved on the main <br />Callahan stated that he felt there was no end to the <br />Ulrich plans and requests. He would like to see an <br />entire plan for both properties to be considered. <br />John Noble stated that he is unaware of any more future <br />plans for the B 1 ohorn property, but he really cannot <br />speak on behalf of Mr. Ulrich. <br />Goetten agreed with Callahan regarding seeing an entire <br />plan . <br />There <br />were no <br />comments from the <br />public regarding this <br />matter <br />and the <br />public hearing was <br />c 1 osed. <br />It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Kelley, to <br />recommend approval of the southern lagoon sea wall <br />request subject to conditions and findings noted in <br />Resolution #1522 approved for the northern lagoon sea <br />wall, and noting that no sea wall would be approved on <br />the main lakeshore. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1. Goetten <br />voted nay. <br /># 10 41 THOMAS J . MAX ELL <br />3685 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9: 3 2 - 5: 5 0 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Present representing Mr. Maxwell was John Ebert of Ebert <br />Construction and Supply. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f i on explained that <br />this application was originally intended as a setback <br />variance application to construct or enlarge an existing <br />horse barn. After the survey was submitted, it <br />indicated that the existing barn was partially located <br />upon the proper* y of Mr. Maxwe l l's aunt, Arlie Thorpe. <br />In order to resolve this problem, Arlie Thorpe planned <br />to deed her land to Mr. Maxwell co he could combine the <br />properties, granting her a life estate. This would <br />present. the problem of two houses on one 10.21 acre <br />pa r ce 1 , which would require a conditional use permit. for <br />use of the second house as, a guest house. <br />