Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMTSSION MEETING HELD JUNE 16, 1986 <br /># 10 3 5 ROBBRT 1COEIINEN CONT. <br />er Planning Commission concurred with staff's <br />interpretation. <br />to <br />No <br />one was present from the <br />public regarding this matter <br />st <br />and <br />the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, <br />due to the Planning Commission's interpretation that <br />this is an alley, not a street, that no variances are <br />required if structure is reduced to no more than 1000 <br />s.f. and maintains the 10' setback from the alley and <br />doors open to the side; and staff be instructed to <br />refund the application fee. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />#1037 JOBN B. BUSSE <br />1951 CONCORDIA STREET <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />POBLIC BEARING 8:28 - 8:40 <br />The Af f idavit <br />was noted. <br />of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />request for conditional use permit and variance to <br />regrade lakeshore yard to create a walk-ou � basement <br />conf iguration. He noted that City Engineer Cook, per <br />his letter, indicated that he felt disruption of the <br />bank could result in a negative impact on Lake <br />Minnetonka and does not recommend approval of the <br />grading plan. <br />John Busse was present for this matter and stated the <br />purpose of creating a walk -out was mainly to finish the <br />basement, provide 1 iaht, and to try and solve the water <br />problem by means of releasing the hydraulic pressure on <br />the foundation. He submitted a letter from Engineer <br />Mark Gronberg which explained the measures that would be <br />taken in order to prevent erasion into the lake. <br />Kelley stated that he was not in favor of this because <br />of his concern of creating a chain reaction in this type <br />of request. <br />Rovegno suggested that this application be table for <br />more review. <br />Goetten agreed with Kelley and Rovegno. <br />Taylor stated that he felt water damage was a legitimate <br />hardship. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />