Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1986 <br />#1020 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN PARR DISTRICT continued <br />Hardcover <br />0-75' - proposed 3.5% (trail, existing gazebo & <br />pumphouse) less limestone paths if found to be permeable <br />- proposed hardcover 1.7 % - 0 % allowed <br />7 5-2 50' ( south side of 51) - proposed 4.1 % ( steps, <br />trails, memorial arbor, portion of parking lot) - 25% <br />allowed <br />250-500' - proposed 16% (visitor center & parking lot) - <br />a i l owed 3 0% <br />Planning Commission felt comfortable with the proposed <br />hardcover. <br />Drainage <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron reviewed the <br />proposed grading and stated that the City Engineer finds <br />no major prob 1 ems. It was noted that all drainage will <br />go into the wetland and that no fill will be removed or <br />brought in to site. <br />Planning Commission found no problems with drainage. <br />Parkin <br />Parking on south side of Cty. Rd. 51 - proposed blacktop <br />parking lot for 50 cars. <br />Taylor stated that he felt that the suggested need to <br />increase the size of the lot was a byproduct of <br />intensification of use. <br />Goetten stated that the existing parking area is not <br />adequate and intensification was not an issue when <br />planning. <br />Mr. Wick 1 and stated that the plan was just to improve <br />the existing lot. <br />George Grooms, 3065 North Shore Drive, stated that he <br />has never seen more than 30 cars, mostly during weddings <br />at. the park. <br />Jim Mitchell, 2865 North Shore Drive, concurred with Mr. <br />Grooms' statement. <br />Intensification & Wedding Issue <br />McDonald indicated that he felt the wedding issue was a <br />commercial use. <br />Ell <br />