My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
10-17-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2022 9:47:42 AM
Creation date
10/17/2022 9:43:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 19, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br />all of the neighboring water comes down on to this site and flows into the backyard. He noted they could, <br />especially with 2817, work with all of these properties and help that situation. <br /> <br />Bollis stated the City has approved some in the ALS with the neighboring house being extremely setback <br />and he remembers those being hundreds of feet setback. He asked if that is accurate. <br /> <br />Curtis replied they have granted ALS variances and she thinks the way the City Council looks at these is <br />from a straight Code standpoint in looking at what the setback line is, what encroachments are being <br />proposed, and whether they are supported by the affected neighbors. She noted they have had all kinds of <br />different orientations of homes affecting the ALS. <br /> <br />Ressler thinks the feedback for the Applicant is to know where this goes with the City Council. Showing <br />the hardcover, even though it is in excess of what is applied for, is still an improvement of what they now <br />have. In talking about odds, he thinks they have better odds of having that entertained. He noted the ALS <br />is historically very restrictive, but rather than tabling he thinks they should rule on what the <br />Commissioners have so it continues forward to the City Council rather than coming back to the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Ressler moved, Kirchner seconded, to deny LA22-000036, 2815 Casco Point Road, Variances as <br />applied, for the reasons provided in comments. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Libby asked to speak about the Orono citizens who came to speak up for what they thought was right. He <br />is not taking sides on this but he was involved in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and can say that Orono <br />has a nicely articulated bluff ordinance that the public may want to look up. Many of the issues and <br />questions discussed today are articulated in that rule of law which the Commissioners are guided by. <br /> <br />2. LA22-000043 SANJA DEGARMO, 2675 FOX STREET, REQUESTS A FRONT YARD <br />SETBACK VARIANCE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION TO THE <br />EXISTING HOME. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) <br /> <br />Sanja DeGarmo, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Staff gave a summary presentation of information. Curtis stated the subject property is on the corner of <br />Fox Street and Gander Road. The property’s narrower frontage is on Gander Road, making Gander Road <br />by definition the “front” for setback purposes. The majority of the property is encumbered by a large <br />wetland, resulting in a relative small buildable area on the 4.4 acre property. The Applicants are <br />requesting variance from the required 50-foot front yard setback in order to construct a 648 square foot <br />attached garage addition to the home. The existing 887 square foot detached garage will be removed. The <br />garage addition is proposed to be set back approximately 35 feet from the front property line, where a 50- <br />foot setback is required. The existing detached garage is located 22 feet from the front property line. The <br />Applicant has identified the wetland encroachment, and the location of the existing improvements as <br />practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting <br />documentation provided in the packet. Staff finds the practical difficulty criteria has been met. The 4.4 <br />acre property contains approximately 3.5 acres of wetland. The majority of the remaining dry land exists <br />within the RR-1B building setbacks. The septic system location on the south side of the home further <br />limits building opportunities in a conforming location. One comment from the public was received in <br />support; Staff recommends approval of the variance as requested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.