My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
9/19/2022 12:42:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 22, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />most important asset which are the Fire Fighters themselves because they are stuck in the middle. Johnson <br />said if there is a way to shelter the Fire Fighters from this by being more cooperative and Orono perhaps <br />giving more than they want to there might be a way to defer some of this stress away from the Fire <br />Fighters as they are the most important piece. He shared they also spoke with neighboring Chiefs, Police <br />Departments, Fire Fighters, and Councilmembers from other communities to find what options are <br />available to the City. <br /> <br />Seals shared regarding the mistrust between the two cities, it goes years beyond this City Council and <br />there is still a lot of talk such as, “are you trying to take Long Lake over?” She stated that is something <br />they have tried to overcome in the meetings. In the packet are some of the keys points discussed with <br />Mayor Miner and Councilmember Dyvik and it is hard to know how both City Councils will feel about it <br />as they both first saw these on Friday. She noted the first and most important bucket is keeping the Chief <br />and Fire Fighters together and there is not an issue in keeping the name of the department Long Lake as <br />there is a long history there. Regarding buildings, Station 1 is owned 50% by each City and currently <br />maintenance and improvements are paid out of the operating budget and each City pays a percentage <br />based on the service they receive. After discussions and because it is an asset that could be sold it seemed <br />fair that each should pay based on ownership. It is also the same for Station 2 which is owned 100% by <br />the City of Orono. Seals shared about a Fire Board which would replace the current Advisory Board with <br />different tenets such as cities who have ownership or are contracted on the Board with a weighted vote <br />based on ownership percentage and the Chief reporting to this Board. This group would be responsible for <br />creating a budget and presenting it to the cities for approval, they would conduct reviews of the Chief, and <br />also be responsible for conversations regarding adding other cities. Administration currently resides with <br />Long Lake and they discussed the benefits of shifting this to Orono due to the larger Staff size including <br />finance and payroll, a City mechanic, Administrative Assistant, and Human Resources. Seals noted the <br />group reached agreement on this topic quite early. Seals spoke about the equipment and the weighted <br />percentage of ownership currently in practice; after much discussion Long Lake felt the most comfortable <br />in keeping it the same and that donated equipment must be approved beyond the Relief Board and the <br />cities need to approve. If the cities’ decided to part ways they would disburse equipment in a different <br />way. If both cities could mutually agree that is great but if not, all equipment would go to auction; both <br />cities agreed that the ownership of equipment needs to be determined 2 years prior to the end of the <br />partnership. Seals clarified cost of service which would be based on the League of Minnesota Cities <br />model and the equation would not change without approval from all cities involved. At any point, if any <br />City would like to end the contract, they must give three years notice to separate and two years to <br />determine the equipment. Seals believes both sides tried to flex where they could and find middle ground <br />and she wants to bring the subject back to the City Council because of the time crunch and planning that <br />must occur. <br /> <br />Johnson noted the “League Model” is one-third population, one-third call hour, and one-third taxable <br />property value. He spoke about fast-depreciating fire equipment and noted it is a concept to see whether <br />the cities can push forward or need to look at alternatives. Both cities will have these conversations with <br />their City Councils to see how aligned they are. <br /> <br />The City Council discussed how the Minnetonka Beach contract is designed and formulated. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh thinks both cities can agree on bullet points 1, 2, and 3. When it comes to the Fire Board he <br />looks at it like the Police Department which includes the advisory committee, City Administrators, <br />representatives from each City, and Mayors who look at the budget together but do not vote on the <br />budget. Rather they have a contract that determines how the budget is put together. He suggested going
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.