My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
9/19/2022 12:42:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
9/19/2022 12:53 PM
Modified:
9/19/2022 12:53 PM
Text:
Council Exhibit F
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 15, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. LA22-000041 ESKUCHE DESIGN, 3005 CASCO POINT ROAD, REQUESTS AN <br />AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A NEW HOME. (STAFF: <br />MELANIE CURTIS) <br /> <br />The Applicants were present. <br /> <br />The Applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a new single family home. As part of the <br />project the property owner plans to combine the subject property with a portion of the property to the <br />north addressed 2987 Casco Point Road. Further they plan to combine the remaining half of 2987 Casco <br />Point Road with the “tennis court lot.” The existing homes are planned to be removed. The Applicant has <br />designed a new home for the newly enlarged property reflected in Exhibit D. For the purpose of this <br />application the Planning Commission should treat the newly enlarged property as existing. If there are any <br />approvals granted, they will be contingent upon completion of all the requirements to administratively <br />move the lot lines. Due to the orientation of the property in relation to the neighboring homes and the <br />curvature of the shoreline, the Applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new <br />home. The Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable practical <br />difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />The neighboring home is pushed back from the lake 210 feet due to a relatively narrow 50 foot lakeshore <br />strip. The result is a large average lakeshore setback over the subject property. The proposed home has <br />been designed to reduce the impact to the adjacent property owners’ views of the lake from the existing <br />condition. The Applicant is proposing to reduce the encroachment into the average lakeshore setback by <br />15 feet, and reorient the home to pull back from the lake and away from the neighboring lots in the <br />average setback area. Comments have been received and are included in the packet. An additional <br />comment was submitted today. Staff finds that the Applicant’s choice to build a replacement home in the <br />proposed location is not supported by practical difficulty, although it slightly improves the lake views <br />from the adjacent home from the existing condition. There is a conforming building envelope on the <br />property to support the Applicant’s proposed home footprint. Finding inadequate practical difficulties to <br />support the request, Planning Staff recommends denial. <br /> <br />Bob Heim, 3005 Casco Point Road, stated this was a three lot parcel and they decided to split it to two <br />parcels based on feedback from the City and neighbors. Now they are trying to build homes that conform <br />with the other homes so they are essentially in a line. Moving the house forward cuts down on the <br />sightline of the neighbor’s pool, although they could plant shrubs on the side to hide the pool. Neighbors <br />on both sides agree with the plan. <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, 2987 Casco Point Road, noted they are trying to balance a consistent setback along <br />what was formerly Lakeshore Avenue. This does require a variance based on where the homes are located <br />but it was designed intentionally and showed the line of homes on screen. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, general contractor, spoke about preserving the Goodwin's sightline. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Dan Seidel, 3015 Casco Point, supports the plan and thinks they put a lot of care and time into it. He <br />stated the reason his house is in its current location is because they took care not to block the Hartswell <br />house or to loom over the house next to them. The setback is improving on the house next to his as it is <br />being moved back, and they have talked about not putting a forest in to preserve Mr. Seidel’s lake view <br />which he appreciates. He thinks they have a chance to line up the historic homes for the next 100 years.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.