Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA22-000040 <br />15 August 2022 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />proposed retaining walls will be constructed with boulders in order to maintain the natural <br />aesthetic of the lake, and will be screened with vegetation wherever feasible. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed retaining walls will <br />continue to maintain the integrity of the slope and protect the slope from catastrophic failure <br />which protects the lake. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the official controls; The owners propose to install retaining wall improvements which <br />are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />owners have proposed retaining walls to protect against failure of the slope. The <br />existing slope of the lake yard was not the result of actions by the owner; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are existing <br />retaining walls in the lake yard. The variance to permit the expanded retaining wall <br />structure within the 75-foot lake setback will help to maintain the existing slope and <br />character of the area. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations <br />have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in <br />Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This <br />condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono <br />City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This <br />condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are permitted to support a residential <br />use in the LR-1C District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a <br />two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property <br />or immediately adjoining property. The slope of the property combined with the pre-existing <br />improvements are unique conditions affecting the subject property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is <br />located. The steep slope, existing failing timber wall configuration, and the existing <br />improvements create conditions which do not apply to all of the adjacent properties. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. Granting a lake setback variance to allow the retaining walls <br />within the 75-foot lake setback to be reconstructed with an expanded footprint is reasonable, is <br />a better solution long-term, and is necessary to preserve the rights of the owner. The variance is <br />supported by the vulnerable slope on the property. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, <br />or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the lake yard setback <br />variance allowing the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback will not adversely impact <br />health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The proposed walls within the lake yard will <br />continue to preserve the integrity of the slope and there is no conforming location to install the