My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
09-12-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
9/19/2022 12:42:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA22-000040 <br />15 August 2022 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />proposed retaining walls will be constructed with boulders in order to maintain the natural <br />aesthetic of the lake, and will be screened with vegetation wherever feasible. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed retaining walls will <br />continue to maintain the integrity of the slope and protect the slope from catastrophic failure <br />which protects the lake. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the official controls; The owners propose to install retaining wall improvements which <br />are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />owners have proposed retaining walls to protect against failure of the slope. The <br />existing slope of the lake yard was not the result of actions by the owner; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are existing <br />retaining walls in the lake yard. The variance to permit the expanded retaining wall <br />structure within the 75-foot lake setback will help to maintain the existing slope and <br />character of the area. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations <br />have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in <br />Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This <br />condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono <br />City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This <br />condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are permitted to support a residential <br />use in the LR-1C District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a <br />two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property <br />or immediately adjoining property. The slope of the property combined with the pre-existing <br />improvements are unique conditions affecting the subject property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is <br />located. The steep slope, existing failing timber wall configuration, and the existing <br />improvements create conditions which do not apply to all of the adjacent properties. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. Granting a lake setback variance to allow the retaining walls <br />within the 75-foot lake setback to be reconstructed with an expanded footprint is reasonable, is <br />a better solution long-term, and is necessary to preserve the rights of the owner. The variance is <br />supported by the vulnerable slope on the property. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, <br />or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the lake yard setback <br />variance allowing the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback will not adversely impact <br />health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The proposed walls within the lake yard will <br />continue to preserve the integrity of the slope and there is no conforming location to install the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.