Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 15, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. LA22-000040 KRIS MURPHY, 1971 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD, REQUESTS A 75’ <br />LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE TO RECONSTRUCT LAKESIDE RETAINING WALLS <br />AND STAIRS. (STAFF: MELANIE CURTIS) <br /> <br />Kris Murphy, on behalf of the Applicants, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis gave a presentation on the item stating the subject property has an existing, failing timber wall and <br />stair system. They plan to reconstruct all of the walls and stairs in the same location and setback from the <br />lake. However, due to the change in wall materials from timber to boulders, the walls will have a larger <br />footprint than existing. Additionally, the existing stair is narrow (ranging between 18” and 2.5 feet in <br />width) and not very functional. They plan to install a 4 foot wide granite stair with a 12 square foot pea <br />rock landing at the turn in its place. A setback variance is required for the new walls. The Applicant has <br />identified the failing retaining wall, protection of the hillside and the need to provide reasonable access to <br />the dock as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided <br />supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. The existing timber retaining walls are made with narrow <br />timbers which are tiered and support the hillside of the property. The existing landscape timbers are not <br />well-suited to support the slope. The existing and proposed stair and wall configuration allow for the <br />existing lake access. The new walls are proposed to utilize the existing footprint and will be constructed at <br />the same setback from the lake. Retaining walls are not permitted within the 75 foot lakeshore setback <br />and in order to replace the system, a setback variance has been requested. A building permit is required <br />and the City Engineer and Building Official will review the plans at the time of permit to determine if an <br />engineering plan is required. Staff finds existing conditions of the failing retaining wall, substandard <br />stairs, and vulnerable hillside are practical difficulties supporting this request. Staff recommends approval <br />of the lake setback variance for the improvements as proposed. Staff further recommends additional <br />screening of the walls be implemented to preserve the natural vegetated view from the lake where <br />feasible. Curtis noted one slight change to the plans submitted earlier in the day and note the Applicant <br />can answer questions regarding that. <br /> <br />Kris Murphy, project manager from Backyard Reflections, stated no substantial trees will be removed. He <br />spoke about the boulders and steps taking up more space than the timber wall and addition of vegetation <br />to with deep root structure to help secure the hillside. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. <br /> <br />McCutcheon thinks this is pretty minimal and the Applicant is just trying to get to the lake which is their <br />right. <br /> <br />Kirchner and Kraemer agreed. <br /> <br />Kraemer moved, Kirchner seconded, to approve LA22-000040, 1971 Fagerness Point Road, <br />Variance. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. <br />