Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />113 <br />221698v1 <br /> <br /> <br />Existing positions require formal analysis for possible reclassification when there have been significant <br />changes to the position that are deemed to be ongoing in nature and may have resulted in a significant <br />increase in the work value, or impact, of the position. <br /> <br />Changes in a position may result from the duties and responsibilities having significantly evolved over <br />time including new duties or a redistribution of duties within a work area. The City will determine the <br />appropriate pay grade level and classification of a position by undertaking an overall analysis of the <br />following, using the Hay Method described above: <br /> <br />• Consideration of the position in relation to the work being performed. <br />• Changes to the position taking into consideration the Hay Methodology criteria. <br />• Comparable positions to ensure equity and consistency in measurement of work value within the unit <br />and across the City. <br />• The ongoing nature of the changes to the duties, responsibilities, and essential requirements. <br /> <br />All of the above factors are considered when making an overall analysis of work value – one factor alone <br />is unlikely to demonstrate an increase in the relative worth of a position. <br /> <br />The following factors or circumstances are not valid considerations in the analysis of work value: <br /> <br />• The incumbent’s performance in the position. <br />• Length of service or time in the position. <br />• Education beyond the minimum required education of the classification. <br />• Knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) the incumbent may have that are not directly relevant to the <br />position under review. <br />• Anomalies and inequities in terms of other positions within the City. <br />• Short term duties performed in addition to the incumbent’s regular position description duties; a one-off <br />or short-term project is not considered as a basis for reclassification. <br />• Mechanism for retention of incumbent. <br />• An increase in the work volume alone is not considered the basis for reclassification; there must be a <br />demonstrated change and increase in work value or impact. <br /> <br />Steps For Requests For Submitting A Reclassification: <br /> <br />Step 1: Discussion <br />If there have been significant ongoing changes to the position duties and responsibilities, this may result <br />in a change in the work value of the position and possibility of the need for reclassification. Contact your <br />Department Head or direct supervisor to discuss updating your Position Description (PD). <br /> <br />Step 2: Initiate Reclassification Action <br /> <br />Incumbent initiates: An agreed upon PD is developed between the incumbent and direct supervisor. <br /> <br />Direct supervisor initiates: The direct supervisor submits an updated PD to reflect the revised duties and <br />responsibilities. The direct supervisor, per policy, is certifying that the PD is accurate. <br /> <br />Note: To avoid confusion about duties and responsibilities, direct supervisors should discuss any changes <br />to the PD with the incumbent who occupies the position which is proposed to be reclassified. Direct <br />supervisors are not required to gain the incumbent’s agreement to the changes; however, incumbents <br />should be made aware of the pending classification review.