My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2022 3:49:47 PM
Creation date
9/7/2022 3:37:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, July 18, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Kirchner’s first thought is that it is an improvement, however this is a completely new structure and these <br />moments offer the opportunity to make it right and make it conforming to the hardcover. That is his <br />struggle and he is hung up on the hardcover variance, noting one can still build there it is just a matter of <br />size and hardcover. <br /> <br />Ressler is in support of this because 60 foot wide lots do not allow accommodation for structure in <br />general, although this is a deeper lot which gives some relief in the calculations. He noted they are <br />meeting lakeshore and north/south setbacks. In looking at the design as proposed he does not know if <br />there is a way to redesign without making more of a nuisance for the neighbors with parking spilling out <br />onto the street. He is in support of the application and feels practical difficulty is met because of the lot <br />width and mitigating circumstances, improvement to existing hardcover, and meeting the setbacks of <br />basically everything else. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon agrees. If it was a lot of massing it would be different but it is subtle, the garage is <br />basically attached to the house. He thinks it is a better layout, they are reducing hardcover, and it is safer <br />for the community and Applicant. He noted on that small of a lot, the Applicant does not have a lot of <br />options. Having the support of the neighbors also helps him with this application. <br /> <br />Erickson appreciates the effort they are making and that it is a narrow lot. However hardcover is still an <br />issue. In the past the Planning Commission was always quite strict if one has a small lot, then they build a <br />small house. Since that time they have seen people wanting a larger house on a small lot and then they see <br />variances with a number of variances already being approved. <br /> <br />Peterson was opposed to the application until the latest publication. He thinks this is good faith of the <br />builder and homeowner and would be in favor. <br /> <br />Ressler moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA22-000035, 2659 Casco Point Road, as amended per <br />the application received today, July 18, 2022. VOTE: Ayes: 4, Nays 2 (Kirchner, Erickson). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.