My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2022 3:49:47 PM
Creation date
9/7/2022 3:37:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, July 18, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />3. LA22-000038 DENNIS WALSH, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE, REQUESTS VARIANCE <br />FOR LAKEYARD SETBACKS TO REPLACE FAILING RETAINING WALLS AND <br />THE LAKE ACCESS STAIR SYSTEM. (STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) <br /> <br />Denny Walsh, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />City Planner Oakden gave a presentation on the item, noting the Applicant has requested a variance to <br />construct a new retaining wall with a minor footprint expansion within the lakeyard setback. The property <br />has an existing timber retaining wall which has been deemed as failing. Pursuant to City Code 78- <br />1726(6), an emergency slope repair request was approved at the City Council on June 27, 2022 as the <br />Applicant and an engineer showed that failure of the wall was an imminent threat to the slope. The <br />Applicant has proposed to construct a new retaining wall directly in front of the existing retaining wall <br />which is one foot wide and directionally bore anchors through the existing wall to hold it in place. The <br />existing wall will stay in place with a new wall built directly in front of it. The repair creates a new <br />footprint expansion within the 75 foot lakeyard. The engineer provided drawings and an analysis stating a <br />slope failure is imminent without this proposed project. The Applicant was issued a building permit on <br />July 7 and the project is shown to cross the property boundary onto 1366 Rest Point Circle; the owners of <br />1366 Rest Point Circle provided an email stating approval for the work that crosses the property <br />boundary. Staff finds the existing condition of the retaining wall, the hill, and the slope with imminent <br />failure are practical difficulties which support this variance request. Staff would like to hear comment on <br />screening of those walls to protect the natural vegetative view if possible. <br /> <br />Denny Walsh, 1354 Rest Point Circle, noted the retaining wall is 6-7 feet tall and 12 feet wide that is 40- <br />50 year old timbers that are failing. The hill has shifted so the wall looks “pregnant” and they cannot take <br />it down or the hill will fall down. Therefore they must build a wall in front of the wall infilled with sand, <br />rock, and anchors to keep the hill intact. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon closed the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. <br /> <br />The Commissioners discussed the item. <br /> <br />Libby noted he is not a structural engineer but is very familiar with this methodology of reinforcing walls. <br />He has had clients with similar circumstances on Eagle Bluff and this method is very practical and <br />minimizes the movement or potential encroachment into the lakeshore. He is in favor of this application. <br /> <br />Kirchner is also in favor, noting one is allowed to maintain a wall that is existing an in place. He thinks it <br />is incumbent for the Commissioners to note that 40 years later engineering and technology has evolved <br />and changed and this is, in a way, maintenance of the wall that is there. He does not think it is egregious <br />in any way. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon agrees, with the wall bowing already it needs to be done and this seems to be a <br />conservative approach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.