My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
06-27-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2022 11:37:04 AM
Creation date
9/7/2022 11:26:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 16, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: <br />Chair Mark McCutcheon, Vice Chair Scott Kirchner, Commissioners Chris Bollis, Dennis Libby, Jon <br />Ressler, Bob Erickson, and Alternate Dave Peterson. Commissioner Matt Gettman was absent. <br />Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Melanie <br />Curtis, and City Planner Laura Oakden. <br /> <br /> <br />1. LA22-000017 JON RESSLER, 3683 & 3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, REQUESTS A LOT <br />WIDTH VARIANCES AS PART OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARY LINE <br />ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. (STAFF: LAURA OAKDEN) <br /> <br />Commissioner Ressler is part of the application and recused himself. He stepped away from his seat. <br /> <br />Jon Ressler and Frank Plachecki, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />City Planner Oakden noted Ressler and Plachecki are neighboring property owners at 3683 and 3685 <br />North Shore Drive. The Applicants are looking to complete an administrative boundary line. Moving the <br />property boundary is a staff administrative action as long as no new non-conformities are created or an <br />existing non-conformity is not increased. Each property will require a lot width variance in order to allow <br />the boundary line adjustment and the existing lot width non-conformity will increase. Lot width is <br />measured in 2 places on lakeshore properties, at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and at the 75 foot <br />lakeyard setback. Properties in the LR-1C district require 100 foot lot width. Both properties are <br />nonconforming to lot width, area and setbacks. Due to the angle of the proposed lot line, the lot width will <br />decrease at the 75 foot lakeyard setback from 54 feet to 52 feet at 3683 (the smaller property on screen) <br />and at 3685 the lot width will decrease from 92 feet to 82 feet at the OHWL. The new property boundary <br />will maintain the same lot area sizes. Oakden stated the new property line will improve many of the non- <br />conformities on the both parcels. The building setback, overall hardcover, and lot width at the OHWL <br />will improve on the smaller property; currently all of those are non-conforming and all will improve and <br />come closer to the City Code. The new property line will move off the existing driveway bringing the <br />driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685 North Shore Drive. Oakden showed a slide on screen <br />showing the proposed adjustments. The Applicant has primarily identified the existing conditions and the <br />improvement of many non-conformities to the city Codes for each property as practical difficulties <br />supporting the requested variance lot width variances and boundary line adjustment. Additionally, they <br />have provided their supporting documentation regarding practical difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Staff finds that the proposed lot line <br />adjustment improving existing non-conformities on hardcover, building setbacks, and driveway setbacks <br />is a positive improvement. The lot width variance requested may be supported by practical difficulty. <br />Staff finds there may be some practical difficulties to support that lot width variance. <br /> <br />Jon Ressler, 3683 North Shore Drive, stated the reason for this application is to apply how the property <br />has been used in practice for over three decades. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.