My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
06-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2022 8:19:05 AM
Creation date
6/22/2022 7:32:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 Date Application Received: 05/12/2022 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:05/28/2022Oho <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/28/2022 <br /> To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members ,�' <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator y � <br /> 4kES H Ott <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planner 111GG <br /> Date: 21 June 2022 <br /> Subject: #LA22-000026,Al Azad, 165 Bederwood Dr, <br /> Variances <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting front yard and side yard setback variances <br /> in order to construct an addition to the existing home. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. <br /> Background <br /> In 2021 the applicant received variances in order to redevelop the property. However, due to <br /> high material and labor costs,they have adjusted their plans. The applicant is now requesting <br /> III approvals in order to construct an attached garage addition on to the existing home.The rear <br /> porch addition will meet the required setbacks,the proposed garage addition will require front <br /> yard and side yard setback variances. <br /> The subject property(represented by the thick black line on survey) extends into/overlaps with <br /> a described railroad right-of-way easement (dashed line highlighted yellow on survey)see <br /> Exhibit C and the image on the right. The proposed addition, shown in blue, encroaches into <br /> this railroad easement area by 3.1 feet, creating �,..... <br /> a setback of 4.4 feet from the northern property tisss343• t-- --— <br /> ----\ <br /> r <br /> line. 4- vsbSide r <br /> •'- s r <br /> S <br /> r Grovel Driveway <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis r ` I yes '; <br /> Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant I by-i 10.2 l-- <br /> has provided supporting documentation H 'ap. Added , I I ✓ <br /> regarding Practical Difficulties attached as I / i �-ar l <br /> Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional flo <br /> j <br /> I <br /> � �80 ltestim n regarding the application. / I RICantieve- , xis n � sed <br /> • .- <br /> Z. <br /> Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff I1 %� iAddn. 1 <br /> L--- <br /> finds the LR-1A zoning district requirements, lot I I '2.' I t--X01-H 10 , - <br /> size,width, and the unique configuration "In Proposed <br /> n m1 <br /> without actual road frontage abutting the Luce 623,,_ _ _____1_-__..2_,_I —J I R, <br /> Line Trail create some practical difficulties for a r Front ,o, <br /> development.The existing detached garage is £ I zr, <br /> • r <br /> constructed right up to the property line within I - <br /> �8ui/d ng Setback- I— 50.0 150— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.