Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA22-000029 <br /> 21 June 2022 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET 4111 <br /> Section 78-420—Accessory Building Setbacks (<1,000 s.f.): <br /> RR-1B Required Proposed <br /> Front 50' ±135' <br /> Rear 15' +100' <br /> East Side 15' +100' <br /> West Side 15' 20' <br /> Section 78-420—Lot Area/Width: <br /> RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' <br /> Actual 138,004 s.f. (3.17 acre) 430' <br /> Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: <br /> The property exceeds 1.99 acres,therefore structural coverage limits do not apply. <br /> Section 78-420—Building Height= Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not <br /> exceed height of principal building: <br /> Peak Height Defined Height <br /> Principal Building ±16 ±12 <br /> Proposed Pole Building 17.3' 15' • <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Height Variance(Code Section 78-420) <br /> The City Code requires accessory buildings to not exceed the height of the home on a property. For a <br /> property with a single story home, or rambler-style home it would not allow a traditional barn or <br /> rural pole barn-type of building with taller side walls.The applicant's proposed building will be well <br /> below the permitted 30-foot defined height limitation, however is limited by the height of the home. <br /> The proposed building will be located to the rear of the home, and will be set on grade that is <br /> approximately 10-feet lower than the front of the home.The proposed pole building is less than <br /> 1,000 square feet and is proposed in a permitted location. <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br /> traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br /> property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for <br /> variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement <br /> would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under <br /> consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be <br /> in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not <br /> constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate <br /> access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered <br /> construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06,subd. 14,when in harmony with this chapter. The <br /> board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter • <br />